Hugh J. McDermott

5.2k total citations
129 papers, 4.0k citations indexed

About

Hugh J. McDermott is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Hugh J. McDermott has authored 129 papers receiving a total of 4.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 100 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 51 papers in Signal Processing and 48 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Hugh J. McDermott's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (93 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (51 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (48 papers). Hugh J. McDermott is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (93 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (51 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (48 papers). Hugh J. McDermott collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Hugh J. McDermott's co-authors include Colette M. McKay, Catherine M. Sucher, Graeme M. Clark, Andrew E. Vandali, Andrea Simpson, Valerie Looi, Tom Francart, Louise Hickson, Adam A. Hersbach and Peter Seligman and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Annals of Neurology and Journal of neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

Hugh J. McDermott

125 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hugh J. McDermott Australia 37 3.5k 1.6k 1.5k 1.5k 491 129 4.0k
Blake S. Wilson United States 29 3.6k 1.0× 1.4k 0.9× 1.0k 0.7× 2.0k 1.4× 473 1.0× 70 4.3k
Donald K. Eddington United States 28 3.0k 0.9× 841 0.5× 760 0.5× 1.8k 1.2× 732 1.5× 42 3.7k
Paul J. Abbas United States 48 6.2k 1.8× 1.7k 1.0× 872 0.6× 4.6k 3.2× 696 1.4× 156 7.0k
Charles C. Finley United States 25 3.7k 1.1× 1.3k 0.8× 859 0.6× 2.2k 1.5× 226 0.5× 43 4.0k
Robert Cowan Australia 28 2.5k 0.7× 740 0.5× 414 0.3× 1.5k 1.0× 452 0.9× 120 3.1k
Bryan E. Pfingst United States 40 3.6k 1.0× 1.1k 0.7× 806 0.5× 2.5k 1.7× 528 1.1× 128 4.2k
Peter J. Blamey Australia 37 3.6k 1.0× 1.1k 0.7× 976 0.6× 1.5k 1.1× 380 0.8× 144 4.3k
Norbert Dillier Switzerland 26 2.1k 0.6× 655 0.4× 644 0.4× 1.2k 0.8× 107 0.2× 105 2.6k
Robert V. Shannon United States 53 9.7k 2.8× 3.3k 2.0× 3.8k 2.5× 4.5k 3.0× 1.0k 2.1× 136 10.9k
Michael F. Dorman United States 23 2.3k 0.7× 947 0.6× 527 0.3× 1.1k 0.7× 156 0.3× 42 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Hugh J. McDermott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh J. McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh J. McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh J. McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh J. McDermott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh J. McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh J. McDermott. The network helps show where Hugh J. McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh J. McDermott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh J. McDermott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh J. McDermott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh J. McDermott. Hugh J. McDermott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Petoe, Matthew A., et al.. (2024). Stimulation artefact removal: review and evaluation of applications in evoked responses. Journal of Neural Engineering. 21(6). 66029–66029.
2.
Sinclair, Nicholas C., et al.. (2019). Objective evaluation of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease using an inexpensive marker-less motion tracking system. Physiological Measurement. 40(1). 14004–14004. 17 indexed citations
3.
Sinclair, Nicholas C., Hugh J. McDermott, James B. Fallon, et al.. (2019). Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease modulates high-frequency evoked and spontaneous neural activity. Neurobiology of Disease. 130. 104522–104522. 45 indexed citations
4.
Perera, Thushara, et al.. (2019). A palm-worn device to quantify rigidity in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 317. 113–120. 12 indexed citations
5.
Perera, Thushara, Shivanthan A.C. Yohanandan, & Hugh J. McDermott. (2015). A simple and inexpensive test-rig for evaluating the performance of motion sensors used in movement disorders research. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 54(2-3). 333–339. 9 indexed citations
6.
Plant, Kerrie, et al.. (2014). Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Experiencing Loss of Usable Acoustic Hearing in the Implanted Ear. Ear and Hearing. 36(3). 338–356. 3 indexed citations
7.
Hersbach, Adam A., David B. Grayden, James B. Fallon, & Hugh J. McDermott. (2013). A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 133(4). 2412–2420. 18 indexed citations
8.
Blamey, Peter J., Nicholas C. Sinclair, Hugh J. McDermott, et al.. (2013). Psychophysics of a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 1044–1044. 6 indexed citations
9.
Francart, Tom & Hugh J. McDermott. (2013). Psychophysics, Fitting, and Signal Processing for Combined Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Stimulation. Ear and Hearing. 34(6). 685–700. 53 indexed citations
10.
McDermott, Hugh J., et al.. (2012). Application of Real-Time Loudness Models Can Improve Speech Recognition for Cochlear Implant Users. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 21(1). 81–87. 8 indexed citations
11.
McDermott, Hugh J.. (2011). A Technical Comparison of Digital Frequency-Lowering Algorithms Available in Two Current Hearing Aids. PLoS ONE. 6(7). e22358–e22358. 35 indexed citations
12.
McDermott, Hugh J., Catherine M. Sucher, & Andrea Simpson. (2009). Electro-Acoustic Stimulation. Audiology and Neurotology. 14(Suppl. 1). 2–7. 58 indexed citations
13.
O’Leary, Stephen, Rachael T. Richardson, & Hugh J. McDermott. (2009). Principles of design and biological approaches for improving the selectivity of cochlear implant electrodes. Journal of Neural Engineering. 6(5). 55002–55002. 55 indexed citations
14.
Looi, Valerie, Hugh J. McDermott, Colette M. McKay, & Louise Hickson. (2008). Music Perception of Cochlear Implant Users Compared with that of Hearing Aid Users. Ear and Hearing. 29(3). 421–434. 125 indexed citations
15.
Looi, Valerie, Hugh J. McDermott, Colette M. McKay, & Louise Hickson. (2008). The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing. International Journal of Audiology. 47(5). 257–268. 51 indexed citations
16.
McDermott, Hugh J. & Catherine M. Sucher. (2006). Perceptual dissimilarities among acoustic stimuli and ipsilateral electric stimuli. Hearing Research. 218(1-2). 81–88. 9 indexed citations
17.
Looi, Valerie, Hugh J. McDermott, Colette M. McKay, & Louise Hickson. (2004). Pitch discrimination and melody recognition by cochlear implant users. International Congress Series. 1273. 197–200. 45 indexed citations
18.
McDermott, Hugh J., et al.. (1997). Preliminary results on spectral shape perception and discrimination of musical sounds by normal hearing subjects and cochlear implantees. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne). 1997. 11–14. 6 indexed citations
19.
McKay, Colette M., Andrew E. Vandali, Hugh J. McDermott, & Graeme M. Clark. (1993). Speech processing for cochlear implants: variations of the spectral maxima sound processor. PLoS ONE. 10(11). e0139970–e0139970. 1 indexed citations
20.
McKay, Colette M., Hugh J. McDermott, Andrew E. Vandali, & Graeme M. Clark. (1992). A Comparison of Speech Perception of Cochlear Implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP(MULTIPEAK) Processor. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 112(5). 752–761. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Blake S. Wilson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Donald K. Eddington Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paul J. Abbas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charles C. Finley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert Cowan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bryan E. Pfingst Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter J. Blamey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Norbert Dillier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert V. Shannon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael F. Dorman
Rankless by CCL
2026