Michelle Proser

712 citations
17 papers · 492 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michelle Proser

16 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers

Michelle Proser
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • General Health Professions 358
  • Health Information Management 64
  • Health 91
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Pharmacy 21
Replace Courtnee Hamity with:
Courtnee Hamity United States
Lovoria B. Williams United States
Steve Gillam United Kingdom
Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman United States
Mary Ruhe United States
Sabrina K. H. How United States
Cathy Thorpe Canada
Celine Hollombe United States
Verena Struckmann Germany
Natalie A. Rivadeneira United States
Michelle Proser relative to Courtnee Hamity United States Courtnee Hamity's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Courtnee Hamity · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Proser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Proser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Proser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Proser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Proser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Proser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Proser. The network helps show where Michelle Proser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michelle Proser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle Proser Line = papers co-authored together Michelle Proser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2017136
2 200791
3 202091
4 201343
5 200536
6 200816
7 201512
8 200911
9 200811
10 202010
11 201410
12 20229
13 20058
14 20143
15 20072
16
High Demand, Low Supply: Health Centers and the Recruitment of Family Physicians.
20182
17
Building a Stronger Science of Community-Engaged Research
20121

About Michelle Proser

Michelle Proser is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Health, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (8 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (2 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (358 citations), Health Information Management (64 citations), Health (91 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations) and Pharmacy (21 citations). Michelle Proser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Shin, Rosy Chang Weir, Erika Cottrell, Khaya D. Clark, Deborah Gurewich, Arwen Bunce, Vivian Li, Deborah J. Cohen, Katie Dambrun and Rachel Gold. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, Health Affairs, BMC Health Services Research, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine and JAAPA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact