Michelle Dynes

1.2k citations
28 papers · 648 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Michelle Dynes

27 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Michelle Dynes
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 402
  • Health 163
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 135
  • General Health Professions 247
  • Finance 72
Replace Glyn Alcock with:
Glyn Alcock United Kingdom
Florina Serbanescu United States
Yuba Raj Paudel Canada
Ayele Geleto Ethiopia
Asm Shahabuddin United States
Idda Mosha Tanzania
Magdalena M. Paczkowski United States
Moses Tetui Sweden
Robin Nesbitt Germany
Tesfay Gebregzabher Gebrehiwot Ethiopia
Michelle Dynes relative to Glyn Alcock United Kingdom Glyn Alcock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Glyn Alcock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Dynes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Dynes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Dynes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Dynes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Dynes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Dynes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Dynes. The network helps show where Michelle Dynes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michelle Dynes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle Dynes Line = papers co-authored together Michelle Dynes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012112
2 201262
3 201456
4 201346
5 202040
6 201739
7 201239
8
Perceptions of the risk for Ebola and health facility use among health workers and pregnant and lactating women--Kenema District, Sierra Leone, September 2014.
201536
9 200936
10 201824
11 201422
12 202121
13 201421
14 201820
15 201918
16 201511
17 20189
18 20248
19 20227
20 20146

About Michelle Dynes

Michelle Dynes is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Health, Nutrition and Dietetics and Epidemiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (19 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (6 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (6 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (3 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (402 citations), Health (163 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (135 citations), General Health Professions (247 citations) and Finance (72 citations). Michelle Dynes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lynn Sibley, Rob Stephenson, Kristin VanderEnde, Kathryn M. Yount, Marcie Rubardt, Florina Serbanescu, Doris Bartel, Paul Chaote, Michelle Schmitz and Darcy White. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health, BMJ Global Health, Midwifery, Vaccine and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact