Michel Lebœuf
- Biochemistry top 0.1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Horticulture top 0.1%
- Co-authors
- André CavéHélène GuinaudeauA. CavéR. MukherjeeBratati MukherjeeAkino JössangReynald HocquemillerDiego Cortés
- Topics
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (53 papers)African Botany and Ecology Studies (11 papers)Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (9 papers)
- Cited by
- HorticultureBiochemistryPharmacology
- Partner nations
- FranceParaguayMadagascar
In The Last Decade
Michel Lebœuf
64 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Biochemistry 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 844
- Plant Science 449
- Pharmacology 431
- Horticulture 403
Countries citing papers authored by Michel Lebœuf
This map shows the geographic impact of Michel Lebœuf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michel Lebœuf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michel Lebœuf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michel Lebœuf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michel Lebœuf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michel Lebœuf. The network helps show where Michel Lebœuf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michel Lebœuf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michel Lebœuf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michel Lebœuf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michel Lebœuf. Michel Lebœuf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Essential oils of Annonaceae. IV. Volatile constituents of the essential oils from five Artabotrys species | 2 |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | Anomurine and anomuricine, two new isoquinoleic alkaloids from Annona muricata | 4 |
| 16 | The phytochemistry of the annonaceaebreakdown → | 312 |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Michel Lebœuf
Michel Lebœuf is a scholar working on Horticulture, Biochemistry and Forestry, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (53 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (11 papers) and Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (403 citations), Biochemistry (1.3k citations) and Pharmacology (431 citations). Michel Lebœuf has collaborated with scholars based in France, Paraguay and Madagascar. Frequent co-authors include André Cavé, Hélène Guinaudeau, A. Cavé, R. Mukherjee, Bratati Mukherjee, Akino Jössang, Reynald Hocquemiller, Diego Cortés, Thierry Sévenet and François Roblot. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.