Michel Cramer–Bornemann
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Maryanne Reilly-SpongCynthia R. GrossMark W. MahowaldRobert PattersonMary Jo KreitzerMelanie M. WallHassan N. IbrahimJohn A. Nyman
- Topics
- Sleep and related disorders (4 papers)Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers)Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michel Cramer–Bornemann
8 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Clinical Psychology 205
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
- Cognitive Neuroscience 143
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 43
- Social Psychology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Michel Cramer–Bornemann
This map shows the geographic impact of Michel Cramer–Bornemann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michel Cramer–Bornemann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michel Cramer–Bornemann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michel Cramer–Bornemann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michel Cramer–Bornemann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michel Cramer–Bornemann. The network helps show where Michel Cramer–Bornemann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michel Cramer–Bornemann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michel Cramer–Bornemann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michel Cramer–Bornemann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michel Cramer–Bornemann. Michel Cramer–Bornemann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 202 | |
| 2 | Mindfulness-based stress reduction for solid organ transplant recipients: a randomized controlled trial. | 109 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 3 |
About Michel Cramer–Bornemann
Michel Cramer–Bornemann is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations), Clinical Psychology (205 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (143 citations). Michel Cramer–Bornemann has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Maryanne Reilly-Spong, Cynthia R. Gross, Mark W. Mahowald, Robert Patterson, Mary Jo Kreitzer, Melanie M. Wall, Hassan N. Ibrahim, Mary Jo Kreitzer, John A. Nyman and William Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Sleep Medicine Reviews, Sleep Medicine and Journal of Forensic Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.