Michaela‐Elena Friedrich
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Siegfried KasperDietmar WinklerWolfgang HufEdda PjrekArkadiusz KomorowskiRupert LanzenbergerMarkus DoldSermin Toto
- Topics
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers)Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michaela‐Elena Friedrich
12 papers receiving 296 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Psychiatry and Mental health 74
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 66
- Clinical Psychology 49
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 45
- Physiology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Michaela‐Elena Friedrich
This map shows the geographic impact of Michaela‐Elena Friedrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaela‐Elena Friedrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaela‐Elena Friedrich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michaela‐Elena Friedrich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaela‐Elena Friedrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaela‐Elena Friedrich. The network helps show where Michaela‐Elena Friedrich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michaela‐Elena Friedrich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michaela‐Elena Friedrich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michaela‐Elena Friedrich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michaela‐Elena Friedrich. Michaela‐Elena Friedrich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 90 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 51 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 41 |
About Michaela‐Elena Friedrich
Michaela‐Elena Friedrich is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 12 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (33 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (66 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (74 citations). Michaela‐Elena Friedrich has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Siegfried Kasper, Dietmar Winkler, Wolfgang Huf, Edda Pjrek, Arkadiusz Komorowski, Rupert Lanzenberger, Markus Dold, Sermin Toto, R. Grohmann and Anastasios Konstantinidis. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Journal of Psychiatric Research and BMC Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.