Michael W. Cole

85 papers receiving 10.7k citations

Hit Papers

Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptiv...2007202620132019201320142007201220132505007501000

Peers

Michael W. Cole
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 9.6k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.3k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.3k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 623
Replace Grega Repovš with:
Grega Repovš Slovenia
Alexander L. Cohen United States
Timothy O. Laumann United States
James Loughead United States
Nico U.F. Dosenbach United States
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski United States
Daniel H. Wolf United States
Deanna M. Barch United States
Christian Windischberger Austria
Joshua L. Roffman United States
Michael W. Cole relative to Grega Repovš Slovenia Grega Repovš's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Grega Repovš · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael W. Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael W. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael W. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael W. Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael W. Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael W. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael W. Cole. The network helps show where Michael W. Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael W. Cole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael W. Cole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael W. Cole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael W. Cole. Michael W. Cole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 0
4 3
5 0
6 8
7 22
8 14
9 83
10 22
11 64
12 56
13 25
14 23
15 25
16 194
17
Heterogeneity within the frontoparietal control network and its relationship to the default and dorsal attention networksbreakdown →
383
18 12
19 121
20 176

About Michael W. Cole

Michael W. Cole is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 90 papers that have together received 10.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (66 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (50 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (9.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.3k citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.3k citations). Michael W. Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovenia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alan Anticevic, Todd S. Braver, Grega Repovš, Walter Schneider, Jonathan D. Power, Danielle S. Bassett, Takuya Ito, John H. Krystal, Douglas H. Schultz and John D. Murray. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Neuron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026