Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance
2014212 citationsMichael W. Bauer, Stefan BeckerJournal of European Integrationprofile →
The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding
202430 citationsKutsal Yesilkagit, Michael W. Bauer et al.Public Administration Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Michael W. Bauer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael W. Bauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael W. Bauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael W. Bauer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael W. Bauer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael W. Bauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael W. Bauer. The network helps show where Michael W. Bauer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael W. Bauer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael W. Bauer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael W. Bauer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael W. Bauer. Michael W. Bauer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Yesilkagit, Kutsal, Michael W. Bauer, B. Guy Peters, & Jon Pierre. (2024). The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding. Public Administration Review. 84(3). 414–425.30 indexed citations breakdown →
Bauer, Michael W. & Stefan Becker. (2014). The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance. Journal of European Integration. 36(3). 213–229.212 indexed citations breakdown →
Jordan, Andrew, Michael W. Bauer, & Christoffer Green‐Pedersen. (2013). POLICY DISMANTLING. Journal of European Public Policy. 20(5). 795–805.94 indexed citations
15.
Bauer, Michael W., et al.. (2011). The Arab World in transition: prospects and challenges for a revitalized relationship between Europe and North Africa. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 57.
Knill, Christoph, Christian Adam, & Michael W. Bauer. (2008). Ausmaß und Ursachen von Organisationsabbau in der deutschen Verwaltung : Eine empirische Analyse der unmittelbaren Bundesverwaltung. 99(2). 153–173.3 indexed citations
19.
Bauer, Michael W.. (2002). Reforming the European Commission - A (Missed?) Academic Opportunity. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6(6). 8.3 indexed citations
20.
Bauer, Michael W. & Philippe C. Schmitter. (2001). Dividend, Birth-Grant or Stipendium? A Reply to Van Parijs & Vanderborght and Matsaganis. Journal of European Social Policy. 11. 62–72.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.