Michael T. Grinder

436 total citations
16 papers, 282 citations indexed

About

Michael T. Grinder is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Media Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael T. Grinder has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 282 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Computer Science Applications, 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 5 papers in Media Technology. Recurrent topics in Michael T. Grinder's work include Teaching and Learning Programming (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (5 papers). Michael T. Grinder is often cited by papers focused on Teaching and Learning Programming (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (5 papers). Michael T. Grinder collaborates with scholars based in United States. Michael T. Grinder's co-authors include Rockford J. Ross, John Grinder, Joshua J. Cogliati and Kathleen F. Walsh and has published in prestigious journals such as ACM SIGCSE Bulletin and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

Michael T. Grinder

16 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael T. Grinder United States 11 153 77 66 58 54 16 282
Tim Wahls United States 8 169 1.1× 65 0.8× 74 1.1× 32 0.6× 57 1.1× 22 280
Steve Roach United States 9 155 1.0× 67 0.9× 50 0.8× 42 0.7× 58 1.1× 36 325
Violetta Lonati Italy 9 214 1.4× 73 0.9× 73 1.1× 26 0.4× 49 0.9× 45 318
Thomas P. Murtagh United States 10 182 1.2× 96 1.2× 55 0.8× 47 0.8× 56 1.0× 24 305
Tom Naps United States 10 273 1.8× 61 0.8× 136 2.1× 67 1.2× 51 0.9× 17 381
John Monk United Kingdom 5 176 1.2× 71 0.9× 101 1.5× 34 0.6× 33 0.6× 17 292
Doug Baldwin United States 13 282 1.8× 82 1.1× 101 1.5× 120 2.1× 50 0.9× 54 420
A. T. Chamillard United States 11 235 1.5× 35 0.5× 108 1.6× 53 0.9× 62 1.1× 31 354
Barry L. Kurtz United States 10 206 1.3× 48 0.6× 58 0.9× 52 0.9× 22 0.4× 52 328
Aidan Mooney Ireland 11 246 1.6× 54 0.7× 86 1.3× 26 0.4× 30 0.6× 40 388

Countries citing papers authored by Michael T. Grinder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael T. Grinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael T. Grinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael T. Grinder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael T. Grinder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael T. Grinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael T. Grinder. The network helps show where Michael T. Grinder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael T. Grinder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael T. Grinder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael T. Grinder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael T. Grinder. Michael T. Grinder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Cogliati, Joshua J., et al.. (2005). Realizing the promise of visualization in the theory of computing. 5(2). 5–5. 21 indexed citations
2.
Grinder, Michael T.. (2003). A preliminary empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of a finite state automaton animator. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 35(1). 157–161. 6 indexed citations
3.
Grinder, Michael T.. (2003). A preliminary empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of a finite state automaton animator. 157–161. 14 indexed citations
4.
Grinder, Michael T.. (2002). Animating automata. 63–67. 19 indexed citations
5.
Grinder, Michael T., et al.. (2002). Loving to learn theory. 371–375. 10 indexed citations
6.
Grinder, Michael T.. (2002). Animating automata. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 34(1). 63–67. 7 indexed citations
7.
Grinder, Michael T., et al.. (2002). Loving to learn theory. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 34(1). 371–375. 10 indexed citations
8.
Grinder, Michael T., et al.. (2001). Engaging students with active learning resources. 65–69. 21 indexed citations
9.
Grinder, Michael T., et al.. (2001). Engaging students with active learning resources. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 33(1). 65–69. 2 indexed citations
10.
Grinder, Michael T., et al.. (1999). Tying it all together. 7–11. 23 indexed citations
11.
Grinder, Michael T., et al.. (1999). Tying it all together. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 31(1). 7–11. 26 indexed citations
12.
Grinder, Michael T., et al.. (1998). A paradigm shift! The Internet, the Web, browsers, Java and the future of computer science education. 145–152. 44 indexed citations
13.
Grinder, Michael T., et al.. (1998). A paradigm shift! The Internet, the Web, browsers, Java and the future of computer science education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 30(1). 145–152. 10 indexed citations
14.
15.
Ross, Rockford J., et al.. (1997). WebLab! A universal and interactive teaching, learning, and laboratory environment for the World Wide Web. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 29(1). 199–203. 12 indexed citations
16.
Grinder, Michael T. & John Grinder. (1989). Righting the educational conveyor belt. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026