Michael T. Grinder
Impact in
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming
- Open Education and E-Learning
- Online Learning and Analytics
- Software top 10%
- Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Papers in
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming 10
- Open Education and E-Learning 4
- Online Learning and Analytics 2
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 6
- Co-authors
- Rockford J. Ross (11 shared papers)John Grinder (1 shared paper)Kathleen F. Walsh (2 shared papers)Joshua J. Cogliati (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (7 papers)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael T. Grinder
16 papers receiving 253 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Computer Science Applications 153
- Software 54
- Media Technology 58
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 66
- Hardware and Architecture 20
Countries citing papers authored by Michael T. Grinder
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael T. Grinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael T. Grinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael T. Grinder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael T. Grinder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael T. Grinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael T. Grinder. The network helps show where Michael T. Grinder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Michael T. Grinder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 44 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 34 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 26 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 23 | |
| 5 | Righting the educational conveyor belt | 1989 | 23 |
| 6 | 2001 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 2 |
About Michael T. Grinder
Michael T. Grinder is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Media Technology, Education and Software, having authored 16 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (5 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (3 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (153 citations), Software (54 citations), Media Technology (58 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (66 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (20 citations). Michael T. Grinder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Rockford J. Ross, John Grinder, Kathleen F. Walsh and Joshua J. Cogliati. Their work appears in journals such as ACM SIGCSE Bulletin and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.