Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories
1976319 citationsMichael StöckerThe Journal of Philosophyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stöcker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stöcker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stöcker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stöcker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stöcker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stöcker. The network helps show where Michael Stöcker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Stöcker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Stöcker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Stöcker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Stöcker. Michael Stöcker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stöcker, Michael, et al.. (2019). Demo Abstract: SnapLoc: An Ultra-Fast UWB-Based Indoor Localization System for an Unlimited Number of Tags. Information Processing in Sensor Networks. 348–349.1 indexed citations
Johnen, Sandra, et al.. (2011). Sleeping Beauty-based Non-Viral Transfer of PEDF into Primary Pigment Epithelial Cells: A Method Yielding in High Transfection Efficiencies and Long Term Expression. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(14). 4379–4379.1 indexed citations
Stöcker, Michael. (1976). The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories. The Journal of Philosophy. 73(14). 453–466.319 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Stöcker, Michael. (1973). Rightness and Goodness: Is There a Difference?. American Philosophical Quarterly. 10(2).2 indexed citations
17.
Stöcker, Michael. (1973). Act and Agent Evaluations. The review of metaphysics. 27(1). 42–61.19 indexed citations
18.
Stöcker, Michael. (1970). Morally Good Intentions. The Monist. 54(1). 124–141.3 indexed citations
19.
Stöcker, Michael. (1970). Intentions and Act Evaluations. The Journal of Philosophy. 67(17). 589–589.6 indexed citations
20.
Stöcker, Michael. (1967). Acts, Perfect Duties, and Imperfect Duties. The review of metaphysics. 20(3). 507–517.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.