Michael Stausberg
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Archeology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Steven EnglerStuart A. WrightCarole M. CusackIngvild Sælid GilhusReinhard SchulzeManfred SchneiderMoojan MomenLéon Wurmser
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (39 papers)Study and Philosophy of Religion (23 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (14 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal for the Scientific Study of ReligionJournal of Contemporary Religion
In The Last Decade
Michael Stausberg
58 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Sociology and Political Science 280
- Philosophy 168
- Anthropology 62
- Health 55
- Archeology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stausberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stausberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stausberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stausberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stausberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stausberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stausberg. The network helps show where Michael Stausberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Stausberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Stausberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Stausberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Stausberg. Michael Stausberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | Die Religion Zarathushtras : Geschichte, Gegenwart, Rituale | 10 |
| 19 | Rec. av Albert de Jong: Traditions of the Magi. Zoroastrianism in Greek and Latin literature; Leiden: Brill, 1997 | 11 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Michael Stausberg
Michael Stausberg is a scholar working on Philosophy, Classics and Anthropology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (39 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (23 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (168 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (46 citations) and Religious studies (41 citations). Michael Stausberg has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Steven Engler, Stuart A. Wright, Carole M. Cusack, Ingvild Sælid Gilhus, Reinhard Schulze, Manfred Schneider, Moojan Momen, Léon Wurmser and Bernhard Lang. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Journal of Contemporary Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.