Michael Sheringham

967 citations
34 papers · 235 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Sheringham

22 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers

Michael Sheringham
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Literature and Literary Theory 55
  • Geography, Planning and Development 26
  • History 38
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 17
  • Urban Studies 20
Replace Deborah Epstein Nord with:
Deborah Epstein Nord United States
William B. Scott Canada
Ariella Azoulay United States
Ewa Mazierska United Kingdom
Alison Light United Kingdom
David Martin‐Jones United Kingdom
Lee Grieveson United Kingdom
Abigail Solomon‐Godeau United States
Laura Rascaroli Ireland
Alex Hughes United Kingdom
Michael Sheringham relative to Deborah Epstein Nord United States Deborah Epstein Nord's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Deborah Epstein Nord · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Sheringham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Sheringham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Sheringham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Sheringham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Sheringham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Sheringham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Sheringham. The network helps show where Michael Sheringham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Michael Sheringham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Sheringham Line = papers co-authored together Michael Sheringham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200686
2 201231
3 199325
4 200012
5 200010
6
The art of the project : projects and experiments in modern French culture
200510
7 20058
8 20217
9 20116
10 19786
11 20165
12 19954
13
'Mon coeur à l'étroit': espace et éthique
20093
14 20232
15
Andre Breton: a bibliography
19722
16 20132
17 19952
18 20132
19 19842
20 20082

About Michael Sheringham

Michael Sheringham is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Computer Networks and Communications and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 34 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Literature and Critical Theory (5 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (3 papers), Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers), French Literature and Poetry (2 papers), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (2 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers) and Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (26 citations), History (38 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (17 citations) and Urban Studies (20 citations). Michael Sheringham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and France. Frequent co-authors include Johnnie Gratton, Catherine Rodgers and Robert Greene. Their work appears in journals such as French Studies, The Modern Language Review, SubStance, Comparative Critical Studies and Paragraph.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact