Michael S. Loop
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 24
- Neural dynamics and brain function 6
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 13
- Co-authors
- Peter H. HartlineLeonard KassS. Murray ShermanDolores M. SchroederSteven H. SchwartzMark A. BerkleyC. Leigh MillicanDouglas C. Smith
- Journals
- Vision Research (10 papers)Visual Neuroscience (4 papers)The Journal of Comparative Neurology (4 papers)Behavioural Brain Research (3 papers)Brain Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Michael S. Loop
45 papers receiving 637 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Cognitive Neuroscience 310
- Sensory Systems 64
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 236
- Developmental Biology 16
- Ophthalmology 65
Countries citing papers authored by Michael S. Loop
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael S. Loop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael S. Loop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael S. Loop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael S. Loop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael S. Loop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael S. Loop. The network helps show where Michael S. Loop may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Michael S. Loop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 2 | Color Vision: Effects of Nicotine Gum in Non-Smokers | 2011 | 5 |
| 3 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 31 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1980 | 14 | |
| 17 | 1979 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 152 | |
| 19 | 1978 | 34 | |
| 20 | 1975 | 3 |
About Michael S. Loop
Michael S. Loop is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sensory Systems and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 46 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (24 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (13 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (10 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers), Color Science and Applications (5 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (310 citations), Sensory Systems (64 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (236 citations), Developmental Biology (16 citations) and Ophthalmology (65 citations). Michael S. Loop has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Peter H. Hartline, Leonard Kass, S. Murray Sherman, Dolores M. Schroeder, Steven H. Schwartz, Mark A. Berkley, C. Leigh Millican, Douglas C. Smith, Laura L. Bruce and Zijiang J. He. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Visual Neuroscience, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Behavioural Brain Research and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.