Michael Roth
- Geophysics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Ocean Engineering top 5%
- Mechanics of Materials
- Mechanical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Volker ØyeM. KornGerhard MüllerKlaus HolligerHom Nath GhartiDaniela KühnRoel SniederBjörn Lund
- Topics
- Seismic Waves and Analysis (24 papers)Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (17 papers)Seismology and Earthquake Studies (9 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresGeophysical Research LettersBritish Journal of Cancer
- Partner nations
- NorwaySwedenSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Michael Roth
32 papers receiving 610 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Geophysics 602
- Artificial Intelligence 181
- Ocean Engineering 167
- Mechanics of Materials 59
- Mechanical Engineering 46
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Roth
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Roth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Roth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Roth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Roth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Roth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Roth. The network helps show where Michael Roth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Roth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Roth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Roth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Roth. Michael Roth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | Should we pursue inter-rater reliability or diversity? An empirical study of pilot performance assessment | 11 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 120 | |
| 11 | Seismic monitoring of the unstable rock slope at Aaknes, Norway | 1 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 87 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 58 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 64 |
About Michael Roth
Michael Roth is a scholar working on Geophysics, Ocean Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 32 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seismic Waves and Analysis (24 papers), Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (17 papers) and Seismology and Earthquake Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (602 citations), Ocean Engineering (167 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (181 citations). Michael Roth has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Sweden and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Volker Øye, M. Korn, Gerhard Müller, Klaus Holliger, Hom Nath Gharti, Daniela Kühn, Roel Snieder, Björn Lund, Olivier De Witte and Zaher Hossein Shomali. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geophysical Research Letters and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.