Michael Rees
Impact in
- Molecular Medicine top 10%
- Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Papers in
- Surgery 4
- Stoma care and complications 2
- Surgical Simulation and Training 1
- Nausea and vomiting management 1
-
- Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms 1
- Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 1
- Co-authors
- John D. Pickard (1 shared paper)J. Garfield (1 shared paper)H Jones (2 shared papers)Omar M. Aboumarzouk (1 shared paper)J. B. Cragg (2 shared papers)Ben Carter (1 shared paper)Peter Billings (2 shared papers)Zaed Hamady (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2 papers)Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1 paper)Oncotarget (1 paper)British journal of surgery (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainGermany
In The Last Decade
Michael Rees
9 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Molecular Medicine 48
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 8
- Hepatology 22
- Pharmacology 41
- Neurology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Rees. The network helps show where Michael Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 85 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 8 | Day surgery. What a difference a day makes. | 1995 | 1 |
| 9 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 |
About Michael Rees
Michael Rees is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Occupational Therapy and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers), Stoma care and complications (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (1 paper), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (1 paper) and Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (48 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (8 citations), Hepatology (22 citations), Pharmacology (41 citations) and Neurology (34 citations). Michael Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John D. Pickard, J. Garfield, H Jones, Omar M. Aboumarzouk, J. B. Cragg, Ben Carter, Peter Billings, Zaed Hamady, Giles J. Toogood and Rajendra Prasad. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Oncotarget, British journal of surgery and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.