Michael Rees

494 total citations
11 papers, 314 citations indexed

About

Michael Rees is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Rees has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 314 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Michael Rees's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Stoma care and complications (2 papers) and Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (1 paper). Michael Rees is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Stoma care and complications (2 papers) and Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (1 paper). Michael Rees collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Spain. Michael Rees's co-authors include J. Garfield, John D. Pickard, J. B. Cragg, Omar M. Aboumarzouk, H Jones, Peter Billings, Ben Carter, J. Peter A. Lodge, Zaed Hamady and Giles J. Toogood and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

In The Last Decade

Michael Rees

9 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael Rees United Kingdom	5	91	78	77	55	48	11	314
Elisa Pirro Italy	12	62 0.7×	81 1.0×	47 0.6×	75 1.4×	9 0.2×	22	437
A. Narayana United States	13	80 0.9×	80 1.0×	98 1.3×	157 2.9×	11 0.2×	46	526
Takehiro Hasegawa Japan	10	20 0.2×	69 0.9×	55 0.7×	55 1.0×	21 0.4×	24	369
Takahiro Shibayama Japan	12	34 0.4×	104 1.3×	135 1.8×	56 1.0×	70 1.5×	37	437
Mi Young Lee South Korea	8	21 0.2×	197 2.5×	33 0.4×	54 1.0×	66 1.4×	9	392
Chisato Sato Japan	11	50 0.5×	82 1.1×	64 0.8×	36 0.7×	11 0.2×	30	363
Jeong Eun Choi South Korea	9	31 0.3×	121 1.6×	113 1.5×	68 1.2×	9 0.2×	23	324
Y. Ravi United States	10	125 1.4×	113 1.4×	70 0.9×	30 0.5×	30 0.6×	38	378
Sonia Khier France	12	57 0.6×	116 1.5×	49 0.6×	42 0.8×	7 0.1×	22	422
Archita Mishra India	9	12 0.1×	122 1.6×	27 0.4×	50 0.9×	16 0.3×	19	276

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Rees

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Rees

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Rees. The network helps show where Michael Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Rees

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Rees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Rees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Rees. Michael Rees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Dreezen, Christa, et al.. (2024). MammaPrint Genomic Assay Providing Prognostic Information in Early Breast Cancer: 10-Year Follow-Up From a Retrospective German Breast Cancer Registry Analysis. 138–147.

2.

Rees, Michael, Christopher R. Smith, Peter Barrett‐Lee, & Stephen Hiscox. (2020). PELP-1 regulates adverse responses to endocrine therapy in Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Oncotarget. 11(51). 4722–4734. 1 indexed citations

3.

Möllmann, Ute, Kerstin Voigt, Chun‐wa Chung, et al.. (2018). Novel insight into the reaction of nitro, nitroso and hydroxylamino benzothiazinones and of benzoxacinones with Mycobacterium tuberculosis DprE1. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 13473–13473. 45 indexed citations

4.

Jones, H, Michael Rees, Omar M. Aboumarzouk, et al.. (2018). Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018(7). CD008905–CD008905. 60 indexed citations

5.

Rees, Michael & Helen Sweetland. (2015). Role of surgeons in the management of cancer. Surgery (Oxford). 33(3). 112–116.

6.

Rees, Michael, et al.. (2014). A structured preceptorship programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Wales: An early experience. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 10(4). 185–185. 2 indexed citations

7.

Rees, Michael, et al.. (2013). Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3 indexed citations

8.

Hamady, Zaed, et al.. (2013). Fatty liver disease as a predictor of local recurrence following resection of colorectal liver metastases. British journal of surgery. 100(6). 820–826. 51 indexed citations

9.

Payne, David, Juan A. Hueso-Rodríguez, Helen Boyd, et al.. (2002). Identification of a Series of Tricyclic Natural Products as Potent Broad-Spectrum Inhibitors of Metallo-β-Lactamases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 46(6). 1880–1886. 83 indexed citations

10.

Rees, Michael, et al.. (1995). Day surgery. What a difference a day makes.. PubMed. 105(5449). 22–3. 1 indexed citations

11.

Pickard, John D., et al.. (1990). Steps towards cost-benefit analysis of regional neurosurgical care.. BMJ. 301(6753). 629–635. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact