Michael R. Wick

880 citations
49 papers · 610 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael R. Wick

47 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Michael R. Wick
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Computer Science Applications 171
  • Software 61
  • Artificial Intelligence 226
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 68
Replace Linda Macaulay with:
Linda Macaulay United Kingdom
Anh Nguyen‐Duc Norway
Alireza Ahadi Australia
Fatih Gürcan Türkiye
Klaus Tochtermann Austria
Karen A. Frenkel United States
Jesualdo Tomás Fernández‐Breis Spain
José A. Macías Spain
Mohd Hasan Selamat Malaysia
Chetna Gupta India
Michael R. Wick relative to Linda Macaulay United Kingdom Linda Macaulay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Linda Macaulay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael R. Wick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael R. Wick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael R. Wick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael R. Wick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael R. Wick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael R. Wick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael R. Wick. The network helps show where Michael R. Wick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Michael R. Wick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael R. Wick Line = papers co-authored together Michael R. Wick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199294
2 199080
3 198848
4 198945
5 199142
6 200536
7 200629
8 200518
9
AGNESS: a generalized network-based expert system shell
198616
10 200116
11 200314
12 200512
13
Reconstructive explanation: explanation as complex problem solving
198911
14 200711
15 200611
16 199211
17 200610
18 19959
19 19959
20 19958

About Michael R. Wick

Michael R. Wick is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Software, having authored 49 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (15 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (9 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (6 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (6 papers), Software Engineering Research (6 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (4 papers), Software Engineering and Design Patterns (4 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (171 citations), Software (61 citations), Artificial Intelligence (226 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (68 citations). Michael R. Wick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include James R. Slagle, William B. Thompson, Daniel E. Stevenson, Fatih M. Uckun, KG Waddick, CW Song, L Souza, Andrew T. Phillips, Ursula Wolz and Tiffany Barnes. Their work appears in journals such as AI Magazine, Blood, Journal of Systems and Software, The Knowledge Engineering Review and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact