This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Parberry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Parberry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Parberry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Parberry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Parberry. The network helps show where Ian Parberry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Parberry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Parberry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Parberry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Parberry. Ian Parberry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McMahan, Timothy, Ian Parberry, & Thomas D. Parsons. (2015). Evaluating Electroencephalography Engagement Indices During Video Game Play.. Foundations of Digital Games.11 indexed citations
2.
Parberry, Ian, et al.. (2015). Comparing Player Attention on Procedurally Generated vs. Hand Crafted Sokoban Levels with an Auditory Stroop Test. Foundations of Digital Games.3 indexed citations
3.
Parberry, Ian. (2007). Problems on Algorithms: Second Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.