Michael Porter

2.6k citations
35 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Porter

34 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Endocrinology 93
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 333
  • Biomaterials 120
  • Molecular Biology 631
  • Biotechnology 73
Replace Wilson Lee with:
Wilson Lee Canada
Helen Spencer United Kingdom
Oh Youn Kim South Korea
Jameel M. Inal United Kingdom
Finn Skou Pedersen Denmark
Roberta Bordoni Italy
Jesús Mateos Spain
Huaiqing Chen China
Lee Ann Sporn United States
Michael Porter relative to Wilson Lee Canada Wilson Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Wilson Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Porter. The network helps show where Michael Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Porter Line = papers co-authored together Michael Porter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013232
2 2006172
3 2004125
4 200899
5 200360
6 201359
7 201557
8 201949
9 201348
10 200243
11 201340
12 196739
13 201838
14 201337
15 200336
16 202033
17 201430
18 200626
19 200724
20 198421

About Michael Porter

Michael Porter is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Ecology and Cell Biology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (9 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (8 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (3 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (93 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (333 citations), Biomaterials (120 citations), Molecular Biology (631 citations) and Biotechnology (73 citations). Michael Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nicola R. Stanley‐Wall, Cait E. MacPhee, Laura Hobley, David J. Wilber, Peter A. Santucci, Adam Ostrowski, Jason R. Swedlow, Alan R. Prescott, Daan M. F. van Aalten and Francesco Rao. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Cancer Research, Microbiology and Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact