Michael Pilling
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Angus GellatlyIan DaviesAnna FranklinDebi RobersonLjubica DamjanovicDavid FoxcroftSharon M. ThomasGeoff G. Cole
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers)Multisensory perception and integration (17 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceMemory & CognitionPsychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Michael Pilling
39 papers receiving 554 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Cognitive Neuroscience 342
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 281
- Social Psychology 127
- Sensory Systems 32
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 30
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pilling
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pilling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pilling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pilling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pilling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pilling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pilling. The network helps show where Michael Pilling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Pilling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Pilling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Pilling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Pilling. Michael Pilling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 74 | |
| 15 | Regional accent familiarity and speechreading performance. | 1 |
| 16 | Benefits of facial and textual information in understanding of vocoded speech. | 1 |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 71 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Michael Pilling
Michael Pilling is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 41 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (17 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (281 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (342 citations) and Sensory Systems (32 citations). Michael Pilling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Angus Gellatly, Ian Davies, Anna Franklin, Debi Roberson, Ljubica Damjanovic, David Foxcroft, Sharon M. Thomas, Geoff G. Cole, Richard M. Noyes and Kerry Raymond. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Memory & Cognition and Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.