Michael O. Hardimon

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 971 citations indexed

About

Michael O. Hardimon is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Genetics and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael O. Hardimon has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 971 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Genetics and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Michael O. Hardimon's work include Race, Genetics, and Society (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers) and Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (2 papers). Michael O. Hardimon is often cited by papers focused on Race, Genetics, and Society (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers) and Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (2 papers). Michael O. Hardimon collaborates with scholars based in United States. Michael O. Hardimon's co-authors include Axel Honneth and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Michael O. Hardimon

15 papers receiving 848 citations

Hit Papers

The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social... 1997 2026 2006 2016 1997 100 200 300 400 500

Peers

Michael O. Hardimon
Alexander G. Weheliye United States
Naomi Zack United States
Kathleen Lennon United Kingdom
Susan D. Amussen United States
Tommie Shelby United States
John D. Schaeffer United States
Mark Hearn Australia
David Wills United Kingdom
Kelly Oliver United States
Alexander G. Weheliye United States
Michael O. Hardimon
Citations per year, relative to Michael O. Hardimon Michael O. Hardimon (= 1×) peers Alexander G. Weheliye

Countries citing papers authored by Michael O. Hardimon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O. Hardimon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O. Hardimon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O. Hardimon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O. Hardimon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O. Hardimon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O. Hardimon. The network helps show where Michael O. Hardimon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael O. Hardimon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael O. Hardimon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael O. Hardimon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael O. Hardimon. Michael O. Hardimon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2024). Where Did Hegel Go Wrong on Race?. 45(1). 23–42.
2.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2023). Is Racism Essentially Systemic?. American Philosophical Quarterly. 60(4). 369–380. 4 indexed citations
3.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2022). Why Social Constructionists Should Embrace Minimalist Race. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 60(S1). 37–53. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hardimon, Michael O., et al.. (2019). Four Ways of Thinking about Race. 26. 103–113.
5.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2019). Should We Narrow the Scope of “Racism” to Accommodate White Sensitivities?. 7(2). 223–246. 7 indexed citations
6.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2017). Minimalist Biological Race. Oxford University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
7.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2017). Rethinking Race. Harvard University Press eBooks. 53 indexed citations
8.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2017). Rethinking Race: The Case for Deflationary Realism. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 18 indexed citations
9.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2013). Race Concepts in Medicine. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 38(1). 6–31. 16 indexed citations
10.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2013). The concept of socialrace. Philosophy & Social Criticism. 40(1). 69–90. 4 indexed citations
11.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2012). The Idea of a Scientific Concept of Race. Journal of Philosophical Research. 37. 249–282. 19 indexed citations
12.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (2003). The Ordinary Concept of Race. The Journal of Philosophy. 100(9). 437–455. 50 indexed citations
13.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (1997). The Struggle for Recognition. The Journal of Philosophy. 94(1). 46–54. 2 indexed citations
14.
Hardimon, Michael O. & Axel Honneth. (1997). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts.. The Journal of Philosophy. 94(1). 46–46. 504 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Hardimon, Michael O., et al.. (1996). Hegel's Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation.. The Philosophical Review. 105(1). 128–128. 79 indexed citations
16.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (1994). Role Obligations. The Journal of Philosophy. 91(7). 333–333. 114 indexed citations
17.
Hardimon, Michael O.. (1994). Hegel's Social Philosophy. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026