Michael Nahm
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs 19
-
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 9
- Co-authors
- Heinz Rennenberg (13 shared papers)Bruce Greyson (6 shared papers)Christopher Morhart (6 shared papers)Arthur Geßler (7 shared papers)A. Geβler (4 shared papers)Mariangela N. Fotelli (5 shared papers)Claudia Keitel (1 shared paper)Andreas Matzarakis (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Trees (5 papers)The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (3 papers)Plant Biology (2 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)Agronomy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Michael Nahm
46 papers receiving 859 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 237
- Global and Planetary Change 309
- Atmospheric Science 187
- Soil Science 88
- Agronomy and Crop Science 93
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Nahm
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Nahm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Nahm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Nahm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Nahm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Nahm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Nahm. The network helps show where Michael Nahm may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Nahm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 40 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 39 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 37 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 29 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 16 |
About Michael Nahm
Michael Nahm is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Global and Planetary Change, Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Plant Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 914 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (19 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (7 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (5 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (5 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (4 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (4 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (237 citations), Global and Planetary Change (309 citations), Atmospheric Science (187 citations), Soil Science (88 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (93 citations). Michael Nahm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Heinz Rennenberg, Bruce Greyson, Christopher Morhart, Arthur Geßler, A. Geβler, Mariangela N. Fotelli, Claudia Keitel, Andreas Matzarakis, K. Radoglou and Emily Williams Kelly. Their work appears in journals such as Trees, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Plant Biology, Alzheimer s & Dementia and Agronomy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.