Michael Lauderdale
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Health top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Louis A. ZürcherRuth G. McRoyDeborah ValentineRichard M. GrinnellMichael J. KellySteven L. McMurtryIra IscoeStephen T. Moore
- Topics
- Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers)Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (5 papers)Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers)
- Journals
- Child Abuse & NeglectChildren and Youth Services ReviewProfessional Psychology Research and Practice
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Lauderdale
19 papers receiving 323 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Clinical Psychology 219
- Sociology and Political Science 167
- Safety Research 129
- Health 74
- General Health Professions 73
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lauderdale
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lauderdale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lauderdale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lauderdale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lauderdale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lauderdale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lauderdale. The network helps show where Michael Lauderdale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Lauderdale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Lauderdale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Lauderdale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Lauderdale. Michael Lauderdale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | The Internet: Opportunities for Rural Outreach, Exchange and Resource Development. | 1 |
| 8 | Motorcycle deaths and injuries in Texas: helmets make a difference. | 20 |
| 9 | 55 | |
| 10 | 72 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | Volunteers as mentors for abusing parents: a natural helping relationship. | 7 |
| 17 | Child welfare curricula in schools of social work: a national survey. | 3 |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2 |
About Michael Lauderdale
Michael Lauderdale is a scholar working on Public Administration, Safety Research and Clinical Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (5 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (129 citations), Clinical Psychology (219 citations) and Health (74 citations). Michael Lauderdale has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Louis A. Zürcher, Ruth G. McRoy, Deborah Valentine, Richard M. Grinnell, Michael J. Kelly, Steven L. McMurtry, Ira Iscoe, Stephen T. Moore and Dong Pil Yoon. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Children and Youth Services Review and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.