Michael Latimer

680 total citations
8 papers, 562 citations indexed

About

Michael Latimer is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Latimer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 562 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 3 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Michael Latimer's work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (3 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (2 papers). Michael Latimer is often cited by papers focused on Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (3 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (2 papers). Michael Latimer collaborates with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Michael Latimer's co-authors include Zhili Xiao, W. K. Kwok, Tao Xu, U. Welp, F. M. Peeters, G. R. Berdiyorov, Yong-Lei Wang, G. W. Crabtree, M. V. Miloševıć and Ralu Divan and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nano Letters and ACS Nano.

In The Last Decade

Michael Latimer

8 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael Latimer United States	7	262	229	175	156	124	8	562
Todd L. Williamson United States	14	256 1.0×	250 1.1×	136 0.8×	114 0.7×	222 1.8×	36	529
Naser Qureshi Mexico	13	300 1.1×	36 0.2×	158 0.9×	260 1.7×	91 0.7×	53	491
M. Henny Switzerland	7	406 1.5×	113 0.5×	245 1.4×	590 3.8×	540 4.4×	7	1.1k
H.W. Kunert South Africa	10	185 0.7×	75 0.3×	57 0.3×	97 0.6×	198 1.6×	73	388
R. Driad Germany	15	604 2.3×	193 0.8×	159 0.9×	265 1.7×	140 1.1×	106	832
Zhangyin Zhai China	16	351 1.3×	100 0.4×	95 0.5×	151 1.0×	415 3.3×	62	632
L. A. K. Donev United States	6	551 2.1×	99 0.4×	85 0.5×	603 3.9×	311 2.5×	6	850
Olaf Krüger Germany	14	362 1.4×	118 0.5×	91 0.5×	122 0.8×	126 1.0×	54	526
G. B. Parravicini Italy	13	236 0.9×	134 0.6×	95 0.5×	321 2.1×	480 3.9×	30	836
Mario F. Borunda United States	15	214 0.8×	111 0.5×	70 0.4×	451 2.9×	346 2.8×	33	769

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Latimer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Latimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Latimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Latimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Latimer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Latimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Latimer. The network helps show where Michael Latimer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Latimer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Latimer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Latimer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Latimer. Michael Latimer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Latimer, Michael, G. R. Berdiyorov, Zhili Xiao, F. M. Peeters, & W. K. Kwok. (2013). Realization of Artificial Ice Systems for Magnetic Vortices in a Superconducting MoGe Thin Film with Patterned Nanostructures. Physical Review Letters. 111(6). 67001–67001. 61 indexed citations

Latimer, Michael, Zhili Xiao, Alexandra Joshi‐Imre, et al.. (2013). Anisotropy of the critical temperature of a superconducting niobium thin film with an array of nanoscale holes in an external magnetic field. Physical Review B. 87(2). 6 indexed citations

Wang, Yong-Lei, Michael Latimer, Zhili Xiao, et al.. (2013). Enhancing the critical current of a superconducting film in a wide range of magnetic fields with a conformal array of nanoscale holes. Physical Review B. 87(22). 62 indexed citations

Berdiyorov, G. R., M. V. Miloševıć, Michael Latimer, et al.. (2012). Large Magnetoresistance Oscillations in Mesoscopic Superconductors due to Current-Excited Moving Vortices. Physical Review Letters. 109(5). 57004–57004. 73 indexed citations

Wang, Yong-Lei, et al.. (2012). Hydrogen responses of ultrathin Pd films and nanowire networks with a Ti buffer layer. Journal of Materials Science. 47(18). 6647–6651. 17 indexed citations

Latimer, Michael, G. R. Berdiyorov, Zhili Xiao, W. K. Kwok, & F. M. Peeters. (2012). Vortex interaction enhanced saturation number and caging effect in a superconducting film with a honeycomb array of nanoscale holes. Physical Review B. 85(1). 40 indexed citations

Wang, Yong-Lei, Michael Latimer, Zhili Xiao, et al.. (2011). Networks of Ultrasmall Pd/Cr Nanowires as High Performance Hydrogen Sensors. ACS Nano. 5(9). 7443–7452. 93 indexed citations

Latimer, Michael, et al.. (2010). Hydrogen Gas Sensing with Networks of Ultrasmall Palladium Nanowires Formed on Filtration Membranes. Nano Letters. 11(1). 262–268. 210 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact