Michael Kyle

426 citations
27 papers · 183 indexed · h-index 8

Michael Kyle

23 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers

Michael Kyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Political Science and International Relations 124
  • Health 34
  • Gender Studies 32
  • Sociology and Political Science 119
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 16
Replace Daniel S. Lawrence with:
Daniel S. Lawrence United States
Alan Beckley Australia
James Hoggett United Kingdom
Branko Lobnikar Slovenia
Matthew Radburn United Kingdom
Julie Barkworth Australia
Christine Famega United States
Sarah Niebler United States
R.I. Mawby United Kingdom
Michael Brogden United Kingdom
Michael Kyle relative to Daniel S. Lawrence United States Daniel S. Lawrence's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel S. Lawrence · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Kyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Kyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Kyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Kyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Kyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Kyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Kyle. The network helps show where Michael Kyle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Michael Kyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Kyle Line = papers co-authored together Michael Kyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20227
3 20221
4 20218
5 20211
6 202123
7 20210
8 20215
9 20200
10 20192
11 201647
12 201626
13 20161
14 20131
15 20133
16 20132
17 20126
18 201214
19 20122
20 20121

About Michael Kyle

Michael Kyle is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Public Administration and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (6 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (5 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (124 citations), Health (34 citations), Gender Studies (32 citations), Sociology and Political Science (119 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (16 citations). Michael Kyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Schafer, George W. Burruss, Matthew J. Giblin, Julie Hibdon, Brett Garland, Mary K. Stohr and Sara Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Crime and Justice, Policing An International Journal, Asian Affairs, International Journal of Police Science & Management and American Journal of Criminal Justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026