Countries where authors publish in Ophthalmology Glaucoma
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ophthalmology Glaucoma more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma
This network shows the impact of papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma.
About Ophthalmology Glaucoma
The 526 papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma usually cover Ophthalmology (465 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (325 papers) and Family Practice (5 papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (452 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (249 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (175 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (122 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (45 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (44 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (30 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ophthalmology Glaucoma are Felipe A. Medeiros, Robert N. Weinreb, Iqbal Ike K. Ahmed, Siamak Yousefi, Brian C. Stagg, Michael H. Goldbaum, Michael V. Boland, Harry A. Quigley, Lilit Voskanyan and Alex S. Huang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.