Michael J. Magazine

81 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management19992026200820171999250500750

Peers

Michael J. Magazine
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 1.8k
  • Management Information Systems 1.7k
  • Strategy and Management 755
  • Management Science and Operations Research 697
  • Computer Networks and Communications 501
Replace Chung‐Piaw Teo with:
Chung‐Piaw Teo Singapore
Stephen C. Graves United States
A.G. de Kok Netherlands
Yves Dallery France
Oded Berman Canada
Yigal Gerchak Canada
Chung‐Yee Lee Hong Kong
Jiafu Tang China
Behrooz Karimi Iran
Tava Lennon Olsen New Zealand
Michael J. Magazine relative to Chung‐Piaw Teo Singapore Chung‐Piaw Teo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Chung‐Piaw Teo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Magazine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Magazine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Magazine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Magazine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Magazine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Magazine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Magazine. The network helps show where Michael J. Magazine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Magazine

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Magazine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Magazine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Magazine. Michael J. Magazine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 12
2 2
3 2
4 4
5 14
6 15
7 38
8 2
9 15
10 1
11 4
12 46
13 10
14 25
15 21
16 167
17 3
18 33
19 30
20
A Survey of Research on Optimal Design and Control of Queues
4

About Michael J. Magazine

Michael J. Magazine is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Information Systems and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 83 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (35 papers), Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (21 papers) and Supply Chain and Inventory Management (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (1.7k citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (1.8k citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (697 citations). Michael J. Magazine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Ram Ganeshan, Sridhar Tayur, Kenneth R. Baker, Uday S. Rao, Cipriano Santos, Michael O. Ball, Henry L. W. Nuttle, Nicholas G. Hall, Yigal Gerchak and Amelie Gamble. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, European Journal of Operational Research and Journal of Operations Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026