Michael J. L. Peers
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 15
- Ecology top 5%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 28
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 13
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 4
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 5
- Small Animals top 5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 5
- Developmental Biology top 10%
-
- Bat Biology and Ecology Studies 6
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 5
- Co-authors
- Dennis L. MurrayDaniel H. ThorntonYasmine N. MajchrzakStan BoutinRudy BoonstraAllyson K. MenziesMorgan WehtjeEmily K. Studd
- Journals
- Ecology (4 papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (3 papers)Oecologia (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael J. L. Peers
38 papers receiving 703 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Ecological Modeling 247
- Ecology 508
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 152
- Small Animals 70
- Developmental Biology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. L. Peers
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. L. Peers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. L. Peers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. L. Peers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. L. Peers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. L. Peers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. L. Peers. The network helps show where Michael J. L. Peers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. L. Peers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 75 |
About Michael J. L. Peers
Michael J. L. Peers is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Small Animals, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 730 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (28 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (15 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (13 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (247 citations), Ecology (508 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (152 citations), Small Animals (70 citations) and Developmental Biology (17 citations). Michael J. L. Peers has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dennis L. Murray, Daniel H. Thornton, Yasmine N. Majchrzak, Stan Boutin, Rudy Boonstra, Allyson K. Menzies, Morgan Wehtje, Emily K. Studd, Guillaume Bastille‐Rousseau and Thomas S. Jung. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Oecologia, Biological Conservation and Ecosphere.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.