Mark O’Donoghue

3.9k total citations
54 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Mark O’Donoghue is a scholar working on Ecology, Ophthalmology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark O’Donoghue has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Ecology, 18 papers in Ophthalmology and 10 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Mark O’Donoghue's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (26 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (18 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (17 papers). Mark O’Donoghue is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (26 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (18 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (17 papers). Mark O’Donoghue collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Mark O’Donoghue's co-authors include Stan Boutin, Charles J. Krebs, Bradford J. Shingleton, Dennis L. Murray, Elizabeth J. Hofer, James M. Heltzer, Rudy Boonstra, Nils Chr. Stenseth, Gustavo A. Zuleta and Vilis O. Nams and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and New England Journal of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Mark O’Donoghue

52 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark O’Donoghue United States 28 1.5k 831 562 500 365 54 2.7k
Jan A. Venter South Africa 22 345 0.2× 718 0.9× 721 1.3× 144 0.3× 57 0.2× 120 1.6k
David S. Jacobs South Africa 32 1.6k 1.0× 17 0.0× 89 0.2× 62 0.1× 2.6k 7.2× 94 3.5k
David Thomson United Kingdom 17 1.5k 1.0× 11 0.0× 14 0.0× 517 1.0× 588 1.6× 40 2.1k
Andrew J. Marshall United States 31 1.3k 0.9× 3 0.0× 237 0.4× 238 0.5× 616 1.7× 123 2.9k
Jeanette Wyneken United States 31 1.2k 0.8× 26 0.0× 10 0.0× 2.4k 4.7× 257 0.7× 86 2.7k
Karen A. Stockin New Zealand 27 1.8k 1.2× 9 0.0× 12 0.0× 242 0.5× 259 0.7× 109 2.1k
Bradford C. Lister United States 15 385 0.2× 5 0.0× 73 0.1× 249 0.5× 549 1.5× 22 1.4k
Bastien Llamas Australia 24 412 0.3× 12 0.0× 22 0.0× 94 0.2× 112 0.3× 82 1.9k
Jennifer M. Arnold United States 18 556 0.4× 8 0.0× 20 0.0× 147 0.3× 294 0.8× 56 1.2k
Grahame J. W. Webb Australia 26 1.2k 0.8× 5 0.0× 18 0.0× 1.4k 2.9× 411 1.1× 87 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark O’Donoghue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark O’Donoghue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark O’Donoghue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark O’Donoghue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark O’Donoghue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark O’Donoghue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark O’Donoghue. The network helps show where Mark O’Donoghue may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark O’Donoghue

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark O’Donoghue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark O’Donoghue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark O’Donoghue. Mark O’Donoghue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Krebs, Charles J., Stan Boutin, Rudy Boonstra, et al.. (2023). Long-term monitoring in the boreal forest reveals high spatio-temporal variability among primary ecosystem constituents. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 11. 11 indexed citations
2.
Krebs, Charles J., Rudy Boonstra, Alice J. Kenney, et al.. (2023). Trends in groundberry cover under climate change in the southern and central Yukon, 1997–2022. Botany. 102(1). 1–9.
3.
O’Donoghue, Mark, Brian G. Slough, Kim G. Poole, et al.. (2022). Snow track counts for density estimation of mammalian predators in the boreal forest. Wildlife Research. 50(6). 425–434. 9 indexed citations
4.
Peers, Michael J. L., Jody R. Reimer, Yasmine N. Majchrzak, et al.. (2021). Contribution of late-litter juveniles to the population dynamics of snowshoe hares. Oecologia. 195(4). 949–957. 2 indexed citations
5.
Boutin, Stan, et al.. (2017). Improving the assessment of predator functional responses by considering alternate prey and predator interactions. Ecology. 98(7). 1787–1796. 27 indexed citations
6.
Shingleton, Bradford J., Yang Yang, & Mark O’Donoghue. (2013). Management and outcomes of intraocular lens dislocation in patients with pseudoexfoliation. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 39(7). 984–993. 51 indexed citations
7.
Shingleton, Bradford J., et al.. (2010). Pseudoexfoliation: High risk factors for zonule weakness and concurrent vitrectomy during phacoemulsification. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 36(8). 1261–1269. 41 indexed citations
8.
Shingleton, Bradford J., et al.. (2008). Effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in eyes with pseudoexfoliation. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 34(11). 1834–1841. 77 indexed citations
9.
Shingleton, Bradford J., et al.. (2008). Outcomes of phacoemulsification in fellow eyes of patients with unilateral pseudoexfoliation. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 34(2). 274–279. 25 indexed citations
10.
Shingleton, Bradford J., et al.. (2006). Comparison of 1-site versus 2-site phacotrabeculectomy. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 32(5). 799–802. 17 indexed citations
11.
Shingleton, Bradford J., et al.. (2004). Efficacy of glaucoma filtration surgery in pseudophakic patients with or without conjunctival scarring. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 30(12). 2504–2509. 18 indexed citations
12.
Rueness, Eli Knispel, Nils Chr. Stenseth, Mark O’Donoghue, et al.. (2003). Ecological and genetic spatial structuring in the Canadian lynx. Nature. 425(6953). 69–72. 107 indexed citations
13.
Shingleton, Bradford J., James M. Heltzer, & Mark O’Donoghue. (2003). Outcomes of phacoemulsification in patients with and without pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 29(6). 1080–1086. 103 indexed citations
14.
Shingleton, Bradford J., et al.. (2002). Phacotrabeculectomy: Peripheral iridectomy or no peripheral iridectomy?. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 28(6). 998–1002. 5 indexed citations
15.
Shingleton, Bradford J., et al.. (2001). Evaluation of intraocular pressure in the immediate period after phacoemulsification. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 27(4). 524–527. 71 indexed citations
16.
Mowat, Garth, Kim G. Poole, & Mark O’Donoghue. (2000). Ecology of lynx in northern Canada and Alaska [Chapter 9]. 30. 265–306. 1 indexed citations
17.
Shingleton, Bradford J. & Mark O’Donoghue. (2000). Blurred Vision. New England Journal of Medicine. 343(8). 556–562. 9 indexed citations
18.
Shingleton, Bradford J., et al.. (1999). Long-term changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal phacoemulsification: Normal patients versus glaucoma suspect and glaucoma patients. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 25(7). 885–890. 188 indexed citations
19.
Shingleton, Bradford J., et al.. (1999). Phacotrabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 106(6). 1152–1155. 28 indexed citations
20.
Litvaitis, John A., et al.. (1982). Cannibalism by a free-ranging Bobcat, Felis rufus. The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 96(4). 476–476. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jan A. Venter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David S. Jacobs Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Thomson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew J. Marshall Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeanette Wyneken Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen A. Stockin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bradford C. Lister Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bastien Llamas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer M. Arnold Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Grahame J. W. Webb
Rankless by CCL
2026