Michael J. Goodwin

28 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Michael J. Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Mechanical Engineering 189
  • Biomedical Engineering 111
  • Control and Systems Engineering 80
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 63
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 34
Replace Matthew Harrison with:
Matthew Harrison United Kingdom
Mark A. Theobald United States
Dongze He China
Dinu Taraza United States
Yibin Guo China
R. Sinhasan India
Günter Offner Austria
K.K. Teh Australia
Christian Roduner Switzerland
J. Jeffrey Moore United States
Michael J. Goodwin relative to Matthew Harrison United Kingdom Matthew Harrison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Matthew Harrison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Goodwin. The network helps show where Michael J. Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Goodwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Goodwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Goodwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Goodwin. Michael J. Goodwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 34
3 4
4 28
5 10
6 85
7 13
8 1
9
Evaluation of Innovative Vessel Inspection Techniques. Phase 1. Hand Held and Basic Technology.
1
10 6
11
INNOVATIVE INSPECTION TECHNIQUES.
1
12 2
13
Development of a Test Program to Evaluate Structural Defects in Glass- Reinforced Plastic (GRP). Volume 2
1
14 33
15 2
16 1
17
Dynamics of rotor-bearing systems
46
18 4
19 29
20 4

About Michael J. Goodwin

Michael J. Goodwin is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Mechanical Engineering and Automotive Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (10 papers), Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis (6 papers) and Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (63 citations), Mechanical Engineering (189 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (80 citations). Michael J. Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gustavo A. Medrano‐Cerda, Darwin G. Caldwell, Tarik Al‐Shemmeri, P. R. Hooper, Hongnian Yu, Wanhai Xu, C. J. Hooke, I. Bennion, W.J. Stewart and D. J. Pratt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Applied Thermal Engineering and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026