Michael J. Fossler
- Internal Medicine top 5%
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 5
- Pharmaceutical Science top 5%
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 6
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism 5
-
- Pharmaceutical studies and practices 8
-
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 6
-
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 6
-
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 6
-
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research 5
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey S. BarrettDavid BurtFranck SkobierandaDavid G. SoergelAyyappa ChaturvedulaMark A. DemitrackJames LeslieNatalie D. Eddington
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
Michael J. Fossler
68 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Internal Medicine 122
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 150
- Pharmaceutical Science 94
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 233
- Pharmacology 100
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Fossler
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Fossler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Fossler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Fossler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Fossler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Fossler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Fossler. The network helps show where Michael J. Fossler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Fossler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 108 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 89 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 67 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 63 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 31 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 23 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 8 |
About Michael J. Fossler
Michael J. Fossler is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Family Practice and Internal Medicine, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical studies and practices (8 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (6 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (122 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (150 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (94 citations). Michael J. Fossler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey S. Barrett, David Burt, Franck Skobieranda, David G. Soergel, Ayyappa Chaturvedula, Mark A. Demitrack, James Leslie, Natalie D. Eddington, April Barbour and Marc R. Gastonguay. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Cancer Research and Endocrinology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.