Michael J. C. Kearsley
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 6
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 6
- Ecology top 10%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 3
- Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes 3
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 3
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 2
-
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 3
-
- Soil erosion and sediment transport 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas G. WhithamKevin D. FloateCharles van RiperBryan T. BrownLiza M. HoleskiTina J. AyersKerry M. ChristensenVicky J. Meretsky
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationInsect ScienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaIreland
In The Last Decade
Michael J. C. Kearsley
13 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 202
- Insect Science 166
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 207
- Ecology 269
- Ecological Modeling 21
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. C. Kearsley
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. C. Kearsley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. C. Kearsley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. C. Kearsley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. C. Kearsley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. C. Kearsley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. C. Kearsley. The network helps show where Michael J. C. Kearsley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. C. Kearsley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 7 | The Response of Salt Cedar, Tamarix Chinensis, to Experimental Flows in the Grand Canyon | 2001 | 1 |
| 8 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 51 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 40 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 93 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 37 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 155 |
About Michael J. C. Kearsley
Michael J. C. Kearsley is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Soil Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (3 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (202 citations), Insect Science (166 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (207 citations), Ecology (269 citations) and Ecological Modeling (21 citations). Michael J. C. Kearsley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Thomas G. Whitham, Kevin D. Floate, Charles van Riper, Bryan T. Brown, Liza M. Holeski, Tina J. Ayers, Kerry M. Christensen, Vicky J. Meretsky, Mark K. Sogge and Abraham E. Springer. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Ornithological Applications, Ecological Applications, Oecologia and Journal of Arid Environments.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.