Michael J. Burek

5.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
64 papers, 4.0k citations indexed

About

Michael J. Burek is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Burek has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 4.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Materials Chemistry, 26 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 10 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Burek's work include Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (17 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (17 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (14 papers). Michael J. Burek is often cited by papers focused on Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (17 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (17 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (14 papers). Michael J. Burek collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Michael J. Burek's co-authors include Marko Lončar, Mikhail D. Lukin, Julia R. Greer, Ronald W. Oppenheim, Hongkun Park, Ruffin E. Evans, Ernest J. Nordeen, Kathy W. Nordeen, Haig A. Atikian and Mihir K. Bhaskar and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Burek

61 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Hit Papers

An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantum-... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael J. Burek United States 30 2.2k 1.7k 1.2k 625 514 64 4.0k
John E. Lewis Canada 38 699 0.3× 897 0.5× 1.3k 1.1× 48 0.1× 370 0.7× 161 4.4k
Stanimir Bonev United States 22 1.0k 0.5× 1.5k 0.9× 997 0.9× 47 0.1× 696 1.4× 44 4.7k
Sergey A. Medvedev Germany 20 757 0.4× 2.1k 1.2× 1.2k 1.0× 47 0.1× 560 1.1× 72 5.8k
Hongbo Wang China 20 366 0.2× 2.0k 1.2× 1.0k 0.9× 60 0.1× 582 1.1× 97 4.7k
Jian Zi China 51 5.0k 2.3× 1.9k 1.1× 3.0k 2.5× 148 0.2× 4.2k 8.2× 253 9.5k
Taras Palasyuk Poland 17 397 0.2× 1.3k 0.8× 913 0.8× 44 0.1× 514 1.0× 34 4.4k
Vadym Drozd United States 25 292 0.1× 2.2k 1.3× 1.6k 1.3× 44 0.1× 727 1.4× 113 5.2k
Patryk Zaleski‐Ejgierd Finland 13 391 0.2× 1.1k 0.6× 942 0.8× 46 0.1× 507 1.0× 21 3.4k
Xinhua Hu China 35 1.4k 0.7× 746 0.4× 1.2k 1.0× 51 0.1× 1.8k 3.6× 109 4.8k
Pavel G. Naumov Germany 15 330 0.2× 1.2k 0.7× 988 0.8× 45 0.1× 543 1.1× 35 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Burek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Burek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Burek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Burek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Burek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Burek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Burek. The network helps show where Michael J. Burek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Burek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Burek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Burek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Burek. Michael J. Burek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nguyen, C. T., Denis D. Sukachev, Mihir K. Bhaskar, et al.. (2019). An integrated nanophotonic quantum register based on silicon-vacancy spins in diamond. Physical review. B.. 100(16). 125 indexed citations
2.
Sun, Shuo, Jingyuan Linda Zhang, Kevin A. Fischer, et al.. (2018). Cavity-Enhanced Raman Emission from a Single Color Center in a Solid. Physical Review Letters. 121(8). 83601–83601. 28 indexed citations
3.
Evans, Ruffin E., Alp Sipahigil, Denis D. Sukachev, et al.. (2017). Single-Photon Switching and Entanglement of Solid-State Qubits in an Integrated Nanophotonic System. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2017. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wang, Cheng, Michael J. Burek, Zin Lin, et al.. (2015). Integrated Lithium Niobate Nonlinear Optical Devices. FW1D.1–FW1D.1. 4 indexed citations
5.
Meesala, Srujan, Young-Ik Sohn, Haig A. Atikian, et al.. (2015). Strain coupling of diamond nitrogen vacancy centers to nanomechanical resonators. FTh3B.4–FTh3B.4. 1 indexed citations
6.
Burek, Michael J., Yiwen Chu, Parth Patel, et al.. (2014). High quality-factor optical nanocavities in bulk single-crystal diamond. Nature Communications. 5(1). 5718–5718. 176 indexed citations
7.
Tsui, Ting Y., et al.. (2012). Suppression of size-dependent softening effects in sub-micron nanocrystalline ruthenium columnar structures. Materials Science and Engineering A. 565. 219–227. 1 indexed citations
8.
Budiman, Arief Suriadi, Michael J. Burek, Dongchan Jang, et al.. (2012). Plasticity of indium nanostructures as revealed by synchrotron X-ray microdiffraction. Materials Science and Engineering A. 538. 89–97. 26 indexed citations
9.
Leeuw, Sander van der, Robert Costanza, S. Aulenbach, et al.. (2011). Toward an Integrated History to Guide the Future. Ecology and Society. 16(4). 91 indexed citations
10.
Jennings, Andrew T., Michael J. Burek, & Julia R. Greer. (2010). Microstructure versus Size: Mechanical Properties of Electroplated Single Crystalline Cu Nanopillars. Physical Review Letters. 104(13). 135503–135503. 180 indexed citations
11.
Burek, Michael J., et al.. (2007). Comparisons of Atmospheric Chemistry Models and Observational Data in Google Earth. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007. 1 indexed citations
13.
Burek, Michael J., Kathy W. Nordeen, & Ernest J. Nordeen. (1997). Sexually dimorphic neuron addition to an avian song-control region is not accounted for by sex differences in cell death. Journal of Neurobiology. 33(1). 61–71. 22 indexed citations
14.
Johnson, R. M., Michael J. Burek, Joan C. Durrance, et al.. (1996). Windows to the universe.. WebNet. 4 indexed citations
15.
Burek, Michael J. & Ronald W. Oppenheim. (1996). Programmed Cell Death in the Developing Nervous System. Brain Pathology. 6(4). 427–446. 215 indexed citations
16.
Burek, Michael J., Kathy W. Nordeen, & Ernest J. Nordeen. (1995). Initial sex differences in neuron growth and survival within an avian song nucleus develop in the absence of afferent input. Journal of Neurobiology. 27(1). 85–96. 20 indexed citations
17.
Burek, Michael J., Kathy W. Nordeen, & Ernest J. Nordeen. (1995). Estrogen promotes neuron addition to an avian song-control nucleus by regulating post-mitotic events. Developmental Brain Research. 85(2). 220–224. 54 indexed citations
18.
Burek, Michael J., Kathy W. Nordeen, & Ernest J. Nordeen. (1994). Ontogeny of sex differences among newly-generated neurons of the juvenile avian brain. Developmental Brain Research. 78(1). 57–64. 40 indexed citations
19.
Nordeen, Ernest J., et al.. (1992). Sex‐dependent loss of projection neurons involved in avian song learning. Journal of Neurobiology. 23(6). 671–679. 64 indexed citations
20.
Burek, Michael J., Kathy W. Nordeen, & Ernest J. Nordeen. (1991). Neuron loss and addition in developing zebra finch song nuclei are independent of auditory experience during song learning. Journal of Neurobiology. 22(3). 215–223. 72 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026