Michael I. Mote

20 total papers · 537 total citations
18 papers, 410 citations indexed

About

Michael I. Mote is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael I. Mote has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 410 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 8 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Michael I. Mote's work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers). Michael I. Mote is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers). Michael I. Mote collaborates with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Michael I. Mote's co-authors include Timothy H. Goldsmith, R�diger Wehner, Sheryl A. Scott, Edward R. Gruberg, Mark T. Wallace, Kevin M. Kelly, Robert J. Stark and Leona J. Rubin and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Development and Vision Research.

In The Last Decade

Michael I. Mote

18 papers receiving 384 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Michael I. Mote 306 158 133 76 68 18 410
Camilla R. Sharkey 178 0.6× 188 1.2× 125 0.9× 61 0.8× 65 1.0× 13 468
Patrick Breads 402 1.3× 184 1.2× 157 1.2× 74 1.0× 44 0.6× 6 470
G. E. Gregory 293 1.0× 184 1.2× 156 1.2× 75 1.0× 46 0.7× 18 480
Anna Stöckl 263 0.9× 285 1.8× 171 1.3× 28 0.4× 46 0.7× 24 467
Cole Gilbert 292 1.0× 200 1.3× 121 0.9× 71 0.9× 28 0.4× 22 433
R�diger Wehner 230 0.8× 192 1.2× 131 1.0× 22 0.3× 46 0.7× 8 409
Erik Zornik 230 0.8× 176 1.1× 63 0.5× 42 0.6× 102 1.5× 18 452
Gordon A. Wyse 228 0.7× 70 0.4× 50 0.4× 69 0.9× 104 1.5× 21 368
Philip Ruck 369 1.2× 165 1.0× 142 1.1× 141 1.9× 51 0.8× 16 483
Atsuko Matsushita 192 0.6× 157 1.0× 111 0.8× 74 1.0× 17 0.3× 23 368

Countries citing papers authored by Michael I. Mote

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael I. Mote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael I. Mote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael I. Mote more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael I. Mote

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael I. Mote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael I. Mote. The network helps show where Michael I. Mote may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael I. Mote

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael I. Mote. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael I. Mote based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael I. Mote. Michael I. Mote is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026