Michael I. Haverty

3.5k citations
130 papers · 2.7k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Michael I. Haverty

129 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Michael I. Haverty
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Insect Science 1.4k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.9k
  • Genetics 2.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 245
  • Ecology 362
Replace H. G. Fowler with:
H. G. Fowler Brazil
G. Benz Switzerland
Brian T. Forschler United States
Thomas Bourguignon Czechia
W. G. Wellington Canada
A. Scholl Switzerland
Seiki Yamane Japan
Xavier Espadaler Spain
R. A. Crowson United Kingdom
Daegan Inward United Kingdom
Michael I. Haverty relative to H. G. Fowler Brazil H. G. Fowler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
H. G. Fowler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael I. Haverty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael I. Haverty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael I. Haverty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael I. Haverty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael I. Haverty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael I. Haverty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael I. Haverty. The network helps show where Michael I. Haverty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael I. Haverty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael I. Haverty Line = papers co-authored together Michael I. Haverty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198299
2 198878
3 198462
4 199658
5 198956
6 198154
7 197353
8 198751
9 199050
10 197450
11 199149
12 198748
13 199648
14 199946
15 198145
16 199745
17 197544
18 200044
19 200041
20 200641

About Michael I. Haverty

Michael I. Haverty is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 130 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (100 papers), Plant and animal studies (78 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (44 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (28 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (9 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.4k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.9k citations), Genetics (2.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (245 citations) and Ecology (362 citations). Michael I. Haverty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Lori J. Nelson, Barbara L. Thorne, William L. Nutting, Vernard R. Lewis, Ralph W. Howard, Marion Page, Minoru Tamashiro, Nan‐Yao Su, Brian T. Forschler and Julian R. Yates. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, Environmental Entomology, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Annals of the Entomological Society of America and Insectes Sociaux.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact