Michael Hocker

872 citations
23 papers · 612 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Hocker

21 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Michael Hocker
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Emergency Medicine 314
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 168
  • Transportation 72
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 224
  • General Health Professions 147
Replace Saber Azami‐Aghdash with:
Saber Azami‐Aghdash Iran
Jo Barnes United Kingdom
Irina Radomislensky Israel
Eduard F. van Beeck Netherlands
Tracy Young United States
Venkataraman Anantharaman Singapore
María Sumie Koizumi Brazil
Ross J. Fleischman United States
Ramón Gálvez-Vargas Spain
Cassandra V. Villegas United States
Michael Hocker relative to Saber Azami‐Aghdash Iran Saber Azami‐Aghdash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Saber Azami‐Aghdash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hocker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hocker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hocker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hocker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hocker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hocker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hocker. The network helps show where Michael Hocker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hocker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Hocker Line = papers co-authored together Michael Hocker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016165
2 201570
3 201167
4 201243
5 200830
6 201329
7 201226
8 201025
9 201625
10 201121
11 201321
12 201717
13 201117
14 199613
15 201713
16 201310
17 20167
18 20115
19 19995
20 20142

About Michael Hocker

Michael Hocker is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (9 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (6 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (6 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (5 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (314 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (168 citations), Transportation (72 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (224 citations) and General Health Professions (147 citations). Michael Hocker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Tanzania and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Charles J. Gerardo, João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci, Catherine A. Staton, Luciano de Andrade, Kenneth E. Schmader, Susan N. Hastings, Jihad Abdelgadir, Megan von Isenburg, Luna Ragsdale and Enying Gong. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Emergency Medicine, Annals of Emergency Medicine, PLoS ONE, Injury and Journal of Medical Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact