Michael H. Wong
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- S. K. AtreyaImke de PaterP. R. MahaffyTobias OwenAmy SimonGlenn S. OrtonHasso B. NiemannPhilip Marcus
- Topics
- Astro and Planetary Science (125 papers)Planetary Science and Exploration (79 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (45 papers)
- Journals
- NatureScienceNature Communications
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
Michael H. Wong
138 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.4k
- Atmospheric Science 644
- Ecology 338
- Molecular Biology 206
- Aerospace Engineering 146
Countries citing papers authored by Michael H. Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael H. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael H. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael H. Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael H. Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael H. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael H. Wong. The network helps show where Michael H. Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael H. Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael H. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael H. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael H. Wong. Michael H. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Juno and Juno-Supporting Observations of Jupiter's 2018-2019 Equatorial Zone Disturbance | 1 |
| 16 | WFC3 Calibration Using Galactic Clusters | 1 |
| 17 | A Dedicated Space Observatory For Time-domain Solar System Science | 3 |
| 18 | Ammonia plumes in the Great Red Spot turbulent wake | 1 |
| 19 | Jovian Hydrocarbons in the 10 bar Region | 2 |
| 20 | Entrainment in the Galileo Probe Site Downdraft | 2 |
About Michael H. Wong
Michael H. Wong is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atmospheric Science, having authored 148 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (125 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (79 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (45 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.4k citations), Atmospheric Science (644 citations) and Ecology (338 citations). Michael H. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include S. K. Atreya, Imke de Pater, P. R. Mahaffy, Tobias Owen, Amy Simon, Glenn S. Orton, Hasso B. Niemann, Philip Marcus, H. Niemann and Xylar Asay‐Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.