Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Grubb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Grubb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Grubb more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Grubb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Grubb. The network helps show where Michael Grubb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Grubb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Grubb.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Grubb based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Grubb. Michael Grubb is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Salas, Pablo, et al.. (2015). Cost-benefit Analysis of Climate Action in Adaptive Economic Systems: A Technology Production and Supply Chain Perspective.1 indexed citations
7.
Grubb, Michael. (2014). Climate change policies in Europe: national plans, EU policies, and the international context. International Journal of Environment and Pollution.
8.
Grubb, Michael, et al.. (2009). Global carbon mechanisms: emerging lessons and implications. UCL Discovery (University College London).17 indexed citations
9.
Grubb, Michael, Tooraj Jamasb, & Michael G. Pollitt. (2008). Delivering a low carbon electricity system for the UK: technology, economics, and policy. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
10.
Grubb, Michael, Tooraj Jamasb, & Michael G. Pollitt. (2008). Delivering a low-carbon electricity system : technologies, economics, and policy. Cambridge University Press eBooks.135 indexed citations
Hepburn, Cameron, et al.. (2006). Auctioning of EU ETS Phase II allowances: why and how?. Climate Policy. 6(1).17 indexed citations
14.
Carraro, Carlo, Michael Grubb, & Hans Joachim Schellnhuber. (2006). Technological Change for Atmospheric Stabilization. The Energy Journal. 27. 1–16.16 indexed citations
15.
Grubb, Michael, et al.. (2006). Russia and the Kyoto protocol : opportunities and challenges.26 indexed citations
16.
Grubb, Michael. (2004). Technology Innovation and Climate Change Policy : An Overview of Issues and Options. UCL Discovery (University College London). 41(2). 103–132.143 indexed citations
Anderson, Dean E., et al.. (1997). Climate change and the energy sector : a country-by-country analysis of national programmes.2 indexed citations
19.
Grubb, Michael. (1996). Renewable energy strategies for Europe : foundations and context. Routledge eBooks.9 indexed citations
20.
Grubb, Michael. (1991). Country studies and technical options.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.