Michael Gillespie

632 total citations
22 papers, 444 citations indexed

About

Michael Gillespie is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Gillespie has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 444 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Michael Gillespie's work include Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (4 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers). Michael Gillespie is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (4 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers). Michael Gillespie collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Michael Gillespie's co-authors include Carol Magai, Nathan S. Consedine, Johannes Kingma, Elisabeth M. TenVergert, Robert A. Silverman, Robert J. Brym, Rhonda Lenton, John Fox, Alfred I. Neugut and Arlene King and has published in prestigious journals such as American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology and The Journals of Gerontology Series B.

In The Last Decade

Michael Gillespie

21 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Gillespie Canada 13 174 103 94 88 48 22 444
Sharon L. Riedel United States 7 107 0.6× 104 1.0× 142 1.5× 67 0.8× 34 0.7× 13 491
Annette Scherpenzeel Netherlands 10 279 1.6× 111 1.1× 193 2.1× 162 1.8× 22 0.5× 23 674
Patrick Denice Canada 12 145 0.8× 138 1.3× 56 0.6× 68 0.8× 31 0.6× 30 499
Dirk Witteveen United Kingdom 11 159 0.9× 160 1.6× 85 0.9× 80 0.9× 38 0.8× 24 555
Jude P. Mikal United States 14 236 1.4× 72 0.7× 97 1.0× 58 0.7× 16 0.3× 29 470
W. van der Vaart Netherlands 11 225 1.3× 55 0.5× 40 0.4× 61 0.7× 12 0.3× 34 462
Tobias Rettig Germany 10 260 1.5× 232 2.3× 160 1.7× 72 0.8× 45 0.9× 30 652
Sabine Friedel Germany 8 223 1.3× 227 2.2× 158 1.7× 71 0.8× 35 0.7× 22 605
Tina Kogovšek Slovenia 13 246 1.4× 51 0.5× 42 0.4× 97 1.1× 16 0.3× 33 408
Teresa Mastin United States 14 170 1.0× 95 0.9× 54 0.6× 58 0.7× 11 0.2× 24 521

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Gillespie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gillespie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Gillespie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gillespie. The network helps show where Michael Gillespie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Gillespie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Gillespie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Gillespie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Gillespie. Michael Gillespie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Conway, Francine, et al.. (2013). A Six-Year Follow-up Study of Social Network Changes among African-American, Caribbean, and U.S.-Born Caucasian Urban Older Adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 76(1). 1–27. 20 indexed citations
2.
Kudadjie-Gyamfi, Elizabeth, et al.. (2005). Breast self-examination practices among women from six ethnic groups and the influence of cancer worry. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 92(1). 35–45. 21 indexed citations
3.
Consedine, Nathan S., et al.. (2005). Health belief model factors in mammography screening: testing for interactions among subpopulations of Caribbean women.. PubMed. 15(3). 444–52. 23 indexed citations
4.
Magai, Carol, et al.. (2004). The differential roles of early emotion socialization and adult attachment in adult emotional experience: Testing a mediator hypothesis. Attachment & Human Development. 6(4). 389–417. 25 indexed citations
5.
Magai, Carol, et al.. (2003). Attachment in African American and European American older adults: The roles of early life socialization and religiosity. Attachment & Human Development. 5(2). 188–214. 44 indexed citations
6.
Magai, Carol, Nathan S. Consedine, Arlene King, & Michael Gillespie. (2003). Physical Hardiness and Styles of Socioemotional Functioning in Later Life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 58(5). P269–P279. 21 indexed citations
7.
Hayduk, Leslie A., Greta G. Cummings, Donna Dosman, et al.. (2003). Pearl's D-Separation: One More Step Into Causal Thinking. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal. 10(2). 289–311. 35 indexed citations
8.
Gillespie, Michael, et al.. (1998). Suicide Following Homicide in Canada. Homicide Studies. 2(1). 46–63. 28 indexed citations
9.
TenVergert, Elisabeth M., Michael Gillespie, & Johannes Kingma. (1993). Testing the assumptions and interpreting the results of the Rasch model using log-linear procedures in SPSS. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 25(3). 350–359. 8 indexed citations
10.
TenVergert, Elisabeth M., Michael Gillespie, Johannes Kingma, & Henk J. Klasen. (1992). Abortion Attitudes, 1984-1987-1988: Effects of Item Order and Dimensionality. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 74(2). 627–642. 8 indexed citations
11.
Gillespie, Michael. (1991). Conceptual Issues in Models of Sibling Resemblance: Comment on Hauser and Mossel (1985) and Hauser (1988). American Journal of Sociology. 97(1). 196–206. 1 indexed citations
12.
Brym, Robert J., Michael Gillespie, & Rhonda Lenton. (1989). Class Power, Class Mobilization, and Class Voting: The Canadian Case. The Canadian Journal of Sociology. 14(1). 25–25. 17 indexed citations
13.
Gillespie, Michael, et al.. (1988). Secular Trends in Abortion Attitudes: 1975-1980-1985. The Journal of Psychology. 122(4). 323–341. 24 indexed citations
14.
Gillespie, Michael, Elisabeth M. TenVergert, & Johannes Kingma. (1988). Using Mokken methods to develop robust cross-national scales: American and West German attitudes toward abortion. Social Indicators Research. 20(2). 181–203. 15 indexed citations
15.
Gillespie, Michael, et al.. (1987). Using Mokken scale analysis to develop unidimensional scales. Quality & Quantity. 21(4). 29 indexed citations
16.
17.
Gillespie, Michael & John Fox. (1980). Specification Error and Negatively Correlated Disturbances in "Parallel" Simultaneous-Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research. 8(3). 273–308. 10 indexed citations
18.
Gillespie, Michael. (1978). The Application of Log-Linear Techniques to Recursive Models: Comment on Reynolds. American Journal of Sociology. 84(3). 718–722. 6 indexed citations
19.
Gillespie, Michael. (1977). Log-Linear Techniques and the Regression Analysis of Dummy Dependent Variables. Sociological Methods & Research. 6(1). 103–122. 85 indexed citations
20.
Gillespie, Michael, et al.. (1969). Relocation in Urban Planning: From Obstacle to Opportunity.. American Sociological Review. 34(3). 411–411. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sharon L. Riedel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annette Scherpenzeel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patrick Denice Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dirk Witteveen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jude P. Mikal Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by W. van der Vaart Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tobias Rettig Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sabine Friedel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tina Kogovšek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Teresa Mastin
Rankless by CCL
2026