Michael Gill

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 282 citations indexed

About

Michael Gill is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Gill has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 282 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 3 papers in Ecological Modeling and 3 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Michael Gill's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers). Michael Gill is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers). Michael Gill collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Michael Gill's co-authors include Henrique M. Pereira, Dandan Yu, Yuxiao He, Mingchang Cao, Haigen Xu, Yun Cao, Kenneth L. Campbell, Healy Hamilton, Xuemei Han and Bruce E. Young and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Michael Gill

17 papers receiving 269 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Ensuring effective implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity targets

2021 185 citations Haigen Xu, Yun Cao et al. Nature Ecology & Evolution profile →

Peers

Michael Gill

GPC

ECOLO

MMPL

EM

NLC

Elena Bukvareva Russia

Pratikshya Kandel Nepal

Caroline Bruce Australia

Mia Rönkä Finland

Ian M. S. Eddy Canada

Ouyang Zhi China

Jonas Geschke Switzerland

Rutilio Castro-Miguel Mexico

María Fernanda López Sandoval Ecuador

Babar Khan Nepal

Elena Bukvareva Russia

Michael Gill

200 ×1.5

GPC

101 ×1.1

ECOLO

57 ×1.0

MMPL

56 ×1.0

EM

66 ×1.6

NLC

Citations per year, relative to Michael Gill Michael Gill (= 1×) peers Elena Bukvareva

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Gill

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Gill

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gill. The network helps show where Michael Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Gill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Gill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Gill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Gill. Michael Gill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Ng, Jonathan, et al.. (2024). MSR72 An Evaluation of the Rayyan Artificial Intelligence Tool for Systematic Literature Review Screening. Value in Health. 27(6). S273–S273. 3 indexed citations

2.

Gill, Michael, et al.. (2024). MSR95 Artificial Intelligence for Targeted Literature Review Screening within the Rayyan Platform. Value in Health. 27(6). S278–S278. 1 indexed citations

3.

Valdez, Jose W., Henrique M. Pereira, Francisco J. Bonet, et al.. (2023). Tailoring evidence into action: Using a co‐design approach for biodiversity information in the Tropical Andes. Conservation Science and Practice. 5(12). 4 indexed citations

4.

Xu, Haigen, Yun Cao, Dandan Yu, et al.. (2021). Ensuring effective implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity targets. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 5(4). 411–418. 185 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Kidd, Chris, et al.. (2021). Assessing the Impact of Light/Shallow Precipitation Retrievals from Satellite-Based Observations Using Surface Radar and Micro Rain Radar Observations. Remote Sensing. 13(9). 1708–1708. 11 indexed citations

6.

Han, Xuemei, Bruce E. Young, Michael Gill, Healy Hamilton, & Sheila Vergara. (2020). Data on Indicators used in Southeast Asian nations’ 4th and 5th National Reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 31. 105705–105705. 2 indexed citations

7.

Han, Xuemei, Michael Gill, Healy Hamilton, Sheila Vergara, & Bruce E. Young. (2019). Progress on national biodiversity indicator reporting and prospects for filling indicator gaps in Southeast Asia. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 5. 100017–100017. 6 indexed citations

8.

Gill, Michael, et al.. (2019). Uneven use of biodiversity indicators in 5th National Reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Environmental Conservation. 47(1). 15–21. 19 indexed citations

9.

Barry, Tom, et al.. (2013). Strategic Plan 2013-2017. Phase II Implementation of the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program.

10.

McRae, Louise, Stefanie Deinet, Michael Gill, & Ben Collen. (2012). Tracking trends in Arctic marine populations. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations

11.

McRae, Louise, Christoph Zöckler, Michael Gill, et al.. (2010). Arctic Species Trend Index 2010: Tracking Trends in Arctic Wildlife. UCL Discovery (University College London). 6 indexed citations

12.

Gill, Michael & Tom Barry. (2008). CBMP Five Year Implementation Plan: Developing an Integrated and Sustained Arctic Biodiversity Monitoring Network. 1 indexed citations

13.

Gill, Michael & Christoph Zöckler. (2008). A STRATEGY FOR DEVELOPING INDICES AND INDICATORS TO TRACK STATUS AND TRENDS IN ARCTIC BIODIVERSITY. 2 indexed citations

14.

Gill, Michael, et al.. (2006). Water Framework Directive: Development of a methodology for the characterisation of a karstic groundwater body with particular emphasis on the linkage with associated ecosystems such as turlough. 3 indexed citations

15.

Campbell, Kenneth L., et al.. (1999). Livestock and environment toolbox. Agritrop (Cirad). 18 indexed citations

16.

Gill, Michael, et al.. (1998). On the genesis of confidence.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 75(5). 1101–1114. 3 indexed citations

17.

Gill, Michael, et al.. (1997). Confidence and accuracy in person perception: Do we know what we think we know about our relationship partners?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 73(4). 747–757. 7 indexed citations

18.

Gill, Michael, et al.. (1997). RADAR-DERIVED DEMS FOR URBAN AREAS. 9 indexed citations

19.

Gill, Michael. (1993). Speed measurement device. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 93(5). 3014–3014. 1 indexed citations

20.

Gill, Michael. (1982). The Concept of Social Need in Broadcasting. Media Information Australia. 24(1). 42–43.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact