Michael Gemar

2.9k citations
19 papers · 2.3k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Gemar

19 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Michael Gemar
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.3k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 117
  • Applied Psychology 160
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 498
Replace Karen L. Kasch with:
Karen L. Kasch United States
Matig Mavissakalian United States
David H. Barlow United States
Emily A. P. Haigh United States
Dana L. McMakin United States
Andrew Peckham United States
I. M. Blackburn United Kingdom
Costas Papageorgiou United Kingdom
Kevin Kjernisted Canada
Deborah Goetz United States
Michael Gemar relative to Karen L. Kasch United States Karen L. Kasch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Karen L. Kasch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Gemar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gemar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gemar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gemar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Gemar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gemar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gemar. The network helps show where Michael Gemar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Gemar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Gemar Line = papers co-authored together Michael Gemar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2006339
2 2002269
3 1999261
4 1999227
5 2003207
6 2001176
7 1996168
8 2001149
9 1995113
10 199599
11 199977
12 199650
13 199739
14 200632
15 200728
16 200324
17 200614
18 199814
19 20001

About Michael Gemar

Michael Gemar is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (11 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (2 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (117 citations), Applied Psychology (160 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (498 citations). Michael Gemar has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Zindel V. Segal, Susan P. Williams, John D. Teasdale, Sidney H. Kennedy, Sandra Sagrati, Jane Williams, Tom Buis, Rebecca Pedersen, Sandy Kennedy and Catherine Truchon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Journal of Urban Health, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact