Jane Williams

4.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
92 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Jane Williams is a scholar working on Equine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Williams has authored 92 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Equine, 34 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 21 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in Jane Williams's work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (49 papers), Sports Performance and Training (25 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (23 papers). Jane Williams is often cited by papers focused on Veterinary Equine Medical Research (49 papers), Sports Performance and Training (25 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (23 papers). Jane Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Jane Williams's co-authors include Zindel V. Segal, John D. Teasdale, Mark A. Lau, Valerie Ridgeway, Michael Gemar, Melanie Fennell, Hayley Randle, I. Nicol Ferrier, Jan Scott and Andrew Brittlebank and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and American Psychologist.

In The Last Decade

Jane Williams

87 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Hit Papers

Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by m... 2000 2026 2008 2017 2000 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Williams United Kingdom 18 2.1k 1.3k 575 409 349 92 3.2k
Samuel F. Mikail Canada 18 1.0k 0.5× 573 0.4× 329 0.6× 297 0.7× 54 0.2× 40 1.9k
Arne Holte Norway 31 1.2k 0.6× 277 0.2× 345 0.6× 475 1.2× 29 0.1× 87 2.7k
Nadine Skoluda Germany 20 520 0.3× 260 0.2× 444 0.8× 349 0.9× 19 0.1× 65 2.3k
Katie T. Kivlighan United States 25 1.4k 0.7× 531 0.4× 1.0k 1.8× 182 0.4× 9 0.0× 39 3.7k
H. Hill Goldsmith United States 25 2.6k 1.2× 876 0.7× 1.4k 2.4× 306 0.7× 27 0.1× 44 3.7k
Jana Strahler Germany 26 898 0.4× 377 0.3× 598 1.0× 337 0.8× 8 0.0× 85 2.4k
Elana B. Gordis United States 28 2.8k 1.4× 343 0.3× 1.3k 2.3× 180 0.4× 9 0.0× 55 4.5k
Peter L. Franzen United States 33 501 0.2× 2.6k 1.9× 224 0.4× 397 1.0× 13 0.0× 86 4.2k
Nancy A. Nicolson Netherlands 41 1.5k 0.7× 2.1k 1.6× 1.3k 2.2× 876 2.1× 4 0.0× 61 5.1k
Brian F. Shaw Canada 32 2.4k 1.2× 1.4k 1.1× 914 1.6× 418 1.0× 12 0.0× 67 3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Williams. The network helps show where Jane Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Williams. Jane Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Nankervis, Kathryn, et al.. (2024). The Role of the Equestrian Professional in Bridle and Bit Fit in the United Kingdom. Animals. 14(22). 3188–3188. 1 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Jane. (2023). Equestrianism's social license to operate: assumptions, reality and the future. 7(5). 196–202. 1 indexed citations
4.
5.
Davies, Emma, et al.. (2023). Anxiety and Depression in British Horseracing Stud and Stable Staff Following Occupational Injury. Animals. 13(21). 3337–3337. 1 indexed citations
6.
Draper, Stephen B., et al.. (2022). Risk factors for lameness elimination in British endurance riding. Equine Veterinary Journal. 55(4). 632–641. 4 indexed citations
7.
Lamy, Elsa, et al.. (2021). Salivary cortisol and eye temperature changes during endurance competitions. BMC Veterinary Research. 17(1). 329–329. 9 indexed citations
8.
Williams, Jane, et al.. (2021). The influence of three working harnesses on thoracic limb kinematics and stride length at walk in assistance dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 45. 16–24. 5 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Jane, et al.. (2020). Relationship Between Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetries in Facial and Limb Traits in Horses and Ponies. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 93. 103195–103195. 3 indexed citations
10.
Williams, Jane, et al.. (2020). Comparison of the Head and Neck Positions in Ridden Horses Advertised in an Australian Horse Sales Magazine: 2005 Versus 2018. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 95. 103280–103280. 2 indexed citations
11.
Hobbs, Sarah Jane, Janet Reed, Rachel Stockley, et al.. (2020). A scoping review of determinants of performance in dressage. PeerJ. 8. e9022–e9022. 24 indexed citations
12.
Σαπουνά, Μαρία, et al.. (2019). Dysfunctional accountability in complaint systems: the effects of complaints on public service employees. The UWS Academic Portal (University of the West of Scotland). 2 indexed citations
13.
Mitchell, Jennifer, et al.. (2019). The Influence of Body Mass and Height on Equine Hoof Conformation and Symmetry. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 77. 43–49. 9 indexed citations
14.
Brennan, Carol, et al.. (2017). Consumer vulnerability and complaint handling: Challenges, opportunities and dispute system design. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 41(6). 638–646. 19 indexed citations
15.
Barnhofer, Thorsten, Danielle S. Duggan, Catherine Crane, et al.. (2007). Effects of meditation on frontal α-asymmetry in previously suicidal individuals. Neuroreport. 18(7). 709–712. 81 indexed citations
16.
Lau, Mark A., Zindel V. Segal, & Jane Williams. (2004). Teasdale’s differential activation hypothesis: implications for mechanisms of depressive relapse and suicidal behaviour. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 42(9). 1001–1017. 171 indexed citations
17.
Orbach, Yael, Michael E. Lamb, Kathleen J. Sternberg, Jane Williams, & Samia Dawud‐Noursi. (2001). The effect of being a victim or witness of family violence on the retrieval of autobiographical memories. Child Abuse & Neglect. 25(11). 1427–1437. 34 indexed citations
18.
Scott, Jan, Jane Williams, Andrew Brittlebank, & I. Nicol Ferrier. (1995). The relationship between premorbid neuroticism, cognitive dysfunction and persistence of depression: a 1-year follow-up. Journal of Affective Disorders. 33(3). 167–172. 62 indexed citations
19.
Marx, Elisabeth, et al.. (1994). SOCIAL PROBLEM-SOLVING IN DEPRESSION. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 44(4). 271–278. 9 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Jane, David Healy, John D. Teasdale, William J. White, & Eugene S. Paykel. (1990). Dysfunctional attitudes and vulnerability to persistent depression. Psychological Medicine. 20(2). 375–381. 65 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026