Michael G. O’Neil
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Oral Surgery top 5%
- Co-authors
- Paul DelfabbroNathaniel P. KatzGeorge A. KennaElliot V. HershJohn PapadopoulosScott T. ReevesNoshir R. MehtaPaul A. Moore
- Topics
- Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers)Poisoning and overdose treatments (3 papers)Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineTourism, Leisure and Hospitality ManagementClinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael G. O’Neil
15 papers receiving 546 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Clinical Psychology 251
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 130
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 104
- Psychiatry and Mental health 101
- Oral Surgery 75
Countries citing papers authored by Michael G. O’Neil
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael G. O’Neil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael G. O’Neil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael G. O’Neil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael G. O’Neil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael G. O’Neil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael G. O’Neil. The network helps show where Michael G. O’Neil may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael G. O’Neil
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael G. O’Neil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael G. O’Neil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael G. O’Neil. Michael G. O’Neil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Prescribing recommendations for the treatment of acute pain in dentistry. | 36 |
| 3 | 95 | |
| 4 | Understanding the cultures of prescription drug abuse, misuse, addiction, and diversion. | 3 |
| 5 | Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition | 248 |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | Vancomycin disposition during continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. | 9 |
About Michael G. O’Neil
Michael G. O’Neil is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Family Practice and Emergency Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (3 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (130 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (20 citations) and Clinical Psychology (251 citations). Michael G. O’Neil has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Delfabbro, Nathaniel P. Katz, George A. Kenna, Elliot V. Hersh, John Papadopoulos, Scott T. Reeves, Noshir R. Mehta, Paul A. Moore, E. Douglas Norcross and Ronald J. Kulich. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Critical Care Medicine and Anesthesia & Analgesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.