Michael G. Booth

619 citations
10 papers · 467 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michael G. Booth

10 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Michael G. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Insect Science 177
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 137
  • Plant Science 344
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 162
  • Cell Biology 123
Replace Ron J. Deckert with:
Ron J. Deckert United States
Cameron Egan United States
Bryony M. Horton Australia
Melissa H. Morris United States
Indrek Hiiesalu Estonia
Tim Krone Schnoor Sweden
Yumiko Miyamoto Japan
Anne Aan Estonia
David García de León Spain
Charles C. Cowden United States
Michael G. Booth relative to Ron J. Deckert United States Ron J. Deckert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ron J. Deckert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael G. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael G. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael G. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael G. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael G. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael G. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael G. Booth. The network helps show where Michael G. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Michael G. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael G. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Michael G. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201313
2 201048
3 201083
4 201075
5 200956
6
Molecular phylogenetic biodiversity assessment of arctic and boreal ectomycorrhizal Lactarius Pers. (Russulales; Basidiomycota) in Alaska, based on soil and sporocarp DNA
200912
7 200844
8 20081
9 200639
10 200496

About Michael G. Booth

Michael G. Booth is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Cell Biology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (9 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (6 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (1 paper), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper) and Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (177 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (137 citations), Plant Science (344 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (162 citations) and Cell Biology (123 citations). Michael G. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jason D. Hoeksema, D. Lee Taylor, Ian Herriott, Niall J. Lennon, Jack W. McFarland, Gary A. Laursen, Chad Nusbaum, Elizabeth L. Kalies, Mary Beth Leigh and József Geml. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Ecology Resources, Ecology, Ecosystems, Molecular Ecology and New Phytologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026