Michael Emerson
Impact in
- General Energy top 2%
-
- European Union Policy and Governance
- International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
- European Politics and Security
- European and International Law Studies
Papers in
-
- European Union Policy and Governance 48
- Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics 39
- European and International Law Studies 26
- European Politics and Security 26
- Russia and Soviet political economy 25
- Regional Development and Policy 9
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 8
- Co-authors
- Gergana Noutcheva (16 shared papers)Nathalie Tocci (21 shared papers)David G. Mayes (1 shared paper)Grant L. Reuber (1 shared paper)Steven Langdon (1 shared paper)Bruno Coppieters (8 shared papers)Richard Youngs (11 shared papers)Daniel Gros (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (1 paper)The Economic Journal (1 paper)Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies (1 paper)Journal of Translational Medicine (1 paper)Economic Policy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michael Emerson
148 papers receiving 915 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- General Energy 44
- Political Science and International Relations 782
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 235
- Development 93
- Economics and Econometrics 318
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Emerson
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Emerson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Emerson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Emerson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Emerson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Emerson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Emerson. The network helps show where Michael Emerson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Emerson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 177 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1975 | 143 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 132 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 67 | |
| 4 | Europeanization and Conflict Resolution: Case Studies from the European Periphery | 2004 | 52 |
| 5 | European Islam : challenges for public policy and society | 2007 | 30 |
| 6 | The economics of 1992 : an assessment of the potential economic effects of completing the internal market of the European Community | 1988 | 28 |
| 7 | Europeanization and secessionist conflicts: concepts and theories | 2004 | 28 |
| 8 | Upgrading the EU's Role as Global Actor: Institutions, Law and the Restructuring of European Diplomacy | 2011 | 26 |
| 9 | Democratisation in the European Neighbourhood | 2005 | 26 |
| 10 | European Neighbourhood Policy Two Years on: Time Indeed for an 'ENP Plus'. CEPS Policy Brief, No. 126, 21 March 2007 | 2007 | 22 |
| 11 | The European Transformation of Modern Turkey | 2004 | 21 |
| 12 | The Reluctant Debutante The European Union as Promoter of Democracy in its Neighbourhood | 2005 | 21 |
| 13 | Europeanisation as a Gravity Model of Democratisation | 2004 | 20 |
| 14 | Evaluating the EU's crisis missions in the Balkans | 2007 | 19 |
| 15 | Moldova and the Transnistrian conflict | 2004 | 19 |
| 16 | The Prospect of Deep Free Trade between the European Union and Ukraine | 2006 | 18 |
| 17 | European Neighbourhood Policy Two Years on: Time Indeed for an 'ENP Plus' | 2007 | 17 |
| 18 | Political Islam and European foreign policy: perspectives from muslim democrats of the mediterranean | 2007 | 17 |
| 19 | Russia’s Punitive Trade Policy Measures towards Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia | 2014 | 16 |
| 20 | 2004 | 15 |
About Michael Emerson
Michael Emerson is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Finance and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 177 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Union Policy and Governance (48 papers), Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (39 papers), European and International Law Studies (26 papers), European Politics and Security (26 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (25 papers), Global trade and economics (11 papers), Regional Development and Policy (9 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Energy (44 citations), Political Science and International Relations (782 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (235 citations), Development (93 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (318 citations). Michael Emerson has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gergana Noutcheva, Nathalie Tocci, David G. Mayes, Grant L. Reuber, Steven Langdon, Bruno Coppieters, Richard Youngs, Daniel Gros, Nicu Popescu and Michel Huysseune. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, The Economic Journal, Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Journal of Translational Medicine and Economic Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.