This map shows the geographic impact of Kemal Derviş's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kemal Derviş with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kemal Derviş more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kemal Derviş. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kemal Derviş. The network helps show where Kemal Derviş may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kemal Derviş
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kemal Derviş.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kemal Derviş based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kemal Derviş. Kemal Derviş is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Derviş, Kemal. (2016). Reflections on Progress: Essays on the Global Political Economy. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).
2.
Derviş, Kemal & Peter Drysdale. (2014). The G-20 Summit at Five: Time for Strategic Leadership. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).10 indexed citations
3.
Derviş, Kemal. (2013). Europa: perspecitvas para el futuro. 19–21.1 indexed citations
Pleskovic, Boris, Michael S. Hofman, Francisco H. G. Ferreira, et al.. (2006). Equity and Development. 1.97 indexed citations
8.
Derviş, Kemal. (2006). Governance and Development. Journal of democracy. 17(4). 153–159.17 indexed citations
9.
Derviş, Kemal, et al.. (2004). The European Transformation of Modern Turkey. CEPS Paperback. September 2004. Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh).3 indexed citations
10.
Derviş, Kemal, et al.. (2004). The European Transformation of Modern Turkey.21 indexed citations
11.
Albrecht, Ulrich, Christine Chinkin, Kemal Derviş, et al.. (2004). A human security doctrine for Europe: the Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe's Security Capabilities. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).28 indexed citations
12.
Derviş, Kemal, et al.. (2004). Stabilising Stabilisation. CEPS EU-Turkey Working Papers No. 7, 1 August 2004. Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh).3 indexed citations
13.
Derviş, Kemal, et al.. (2004). Turkey and the EU Budget: Prospects and Issues. CEPS EU-Turkey Working Papers No. 6, 1 August 2004. Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh).5 indexed citations
14.
Derviş, Kemal, et al.. (2004). Relative Income Growth and Convergence. CEPS EU-Turkey Working Papers No. 8, 1 August 2004. Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh).9 indexed citations
15.
Derviş, Kemal. (2001). The Mediterranean, Europe and Globalization: Keys to the future. Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute).1 indexed citations
16.
Derviş, Kemal & Nemat Shafik. (1998). The Middle East and North Africa: a tale of two futures. The Middle East Journal. 52(4). 505–516.10 indexed citations
Derviş, Kemal & Timothy P. Condon. (1994). Hungary - Partial Successes and Remaining Challenges: The Emergence of a "Gradualist" Success Story?. NBER Chapters. 123–154.3 indexed citations
19.
Derviş, Kemal. (1994). The evolving role of the World Bank : the transition in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. 1.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.