Michael E. Cooper
Impact in
- Biophysics top 5%
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Bioengineering top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling 2
- Co-authors
- M. Briggs (3 shared papers)Nigel J. Pyne (4 shared papers)Miles D. Houslay (4 shared papers)Susan J. Gregory (2 shared papers)S. Kalinka (2 shared papers)Elaine J. Adie (2 shared papers)Richard M. West (2 shared papers)Andreas Ebner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Fluorescence (2 papers)Drug Discovery Today (2 papers)Biochemical Journal (2 papers)BioTechniques (2 papers)Biochemical Society Transactions (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Michael E. Cooper
17 papers receiving 850 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Biophysics 89
- Bioengineering 66
- Spectroscopy 147
- Organic Chemistry 189
- Molecular Biology 448
Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Cooper
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Cooper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Cooper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Cooper. The network helps show where Michael E. Cooper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 209 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 117 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 99 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 74 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 73 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 63 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 62 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 16 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1986 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 16 | Sex Roles and Incoming College Student Drinking Behavior. | 1981 | 3 |
| 17 | 1986 | 1 |
About Michael E. Cooper
Michael E. Cooper is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Physiology, Biophysics, Spectroscopy and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 17 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phosphodiesterase function and regulation (4 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (3 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (2 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (1 paper), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (1 paper) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (89 citations), Bioengineering (66 citations), Spectroscopy (147 citations), Organic Chemistry (189 citations) and Molecular Biology (448 citations). Michael E. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include M. Briggs, Nigel J. Pyne, Miles D. Houslay, Susan J. Gregory, S. Kalinka, Elaine J. Adie, Richard M. West, Andreas Ebner, Robert M. Richardson and Peter G. Sammes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Fluorescence, Drug Discovery Today, Biochemical Journal, BioTechniques and Biochemical Society Transactions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.