Michael Dabrowski

964 citations
32 papers · 734 indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Dabrowski

32 papers receiving 722 citations

Peers

Michael Dabrowski
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 60
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 192
  • Developmental Neuroscience 38
  • Sensory Systems 44
  • Emergency Medicine 68
Replace Bert Vanheel with:
Bert Vanheel Belgium
Alexander N. Katchman United States
Masao Endoh Japan
R. Xhonneux Belgium
Koroku Hashimoto Japan
Euiyong Kim South Korea
Sibel Kahraman Türkiye
Mitchell I. Steinberg United States
Campbell Wilson United Kingdom
José A. Sánchez‐Chapula Mexico
Michael Dabrowski relative to Bert Vanheel Belgium Bert Vanheel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bert Vanheel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Dabrowski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Dabrowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Dabrowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Dabrowski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Dabrowski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Dabrowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Dabrowski. The network helps show where Michael Dabrowski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Dabrowski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Dabrowski Line = papers co-authored together Michael Dabrowski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200176
2 200667
3 200351
4 201847
5 200347
6 200934
7 200433
8 200632
9 201831
10 201330
11 200229
12 200226
13 200324
14 200324
15 202023
16 201021
17 200317
18 201417
19 197816
20 200313

About Michael Dabrowski

Michael Dabrowski is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 32 papers that have together received 734 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (12 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (11 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (60 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (192 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (38 citations), Sensory Systems (44 citations) and Emergency Medicine (68 citations). Michael Dabrowski has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frances M. Ashcroft, Malin Jonsson Fagerlund, Philip Wahl, Lars I. Eriksson, Olof Larsson, William E. Holmes, John Bondo Hansen, David Gurley, Edwin C. Johnson and Johannes Krupp. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Diabetologia, SLAS DISCOVERY, Anesthesiology and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact