Michael C. Mooij

530 total citations
15 papers, 351 citations indexed

About

Michael C. Mooij is a scholar working on Surgery, Internal Medicine and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael C. Mooij has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 351 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 14 papers in Internal Medicine and 6 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Michael C. Mooij's work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (15 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (14 papers) and Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (6 papers). Michael C. Mooij is often cited by papers focused on Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (15 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (14 papers) and Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (6 papers). Michael C. Mooij collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Greece. Michael C. Mooij's co-authors include Pascal Pronk, Menno Gaastra, Stefanie A. Gauw, James A. Lawson, C.J. van Vlijmen-van Keulen, Marco J.D. Tangelder, Çağdaş Ünlü, Michiel A. Schreve, Eline Huizing and James Lawson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, BMJ Open and Wound Repair and Regeneration.

In The Last Decade

Michael C. Mooij

14 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael C. Mooij Netherlands 9 330 289 107 91 42 15 351
W.B. van Gent Netherlands 5 256 0.8× 205 0.7× 46 0.4× 54 0.6× 12 0.3× 6 271
C. Davies United Kingdom 6 499 1.5× 394 1.4× 82 0.8× 101 1.1× 38 0.9× 8 529
Alfred Obermayer Austria 6 151 0.5× 129 0.4× 33 0.3× 25 0.3× 14 0.3× 18 165
F. Pannier Germany 4 298 0.9× 277 1.0× 40 0.4× 62 0.7× 47 1.1× 7 310
Anthony Mekako United Kingdom 9 502 1.5× 470 1.6× 200 1.9× 133 1.5× 71 1.7× 13 516
Steve Elias United States 7 241 0.7× 227 0.8× 74 0.7× 77 0.8× 29 0.7× 16 248
Pascal Pronk Netherlands 7 329 1.0× 303 1.0× 109 1.0× 98 1.1× 44 1.0× 9 332
Uldis Maurins Germany 6 433 1.3× 415 1.4× 140 1.3× 100 1.1× 77 1.8× 7 453
James Lawson Germany 8 270 0.8× 257 0.9× 72 0.7× 124 1.4× 24 0.6× 11 274
Anke Biemans Netherlands 8 366 1.1× 356 1.2× 101 0.9× 111 1.2× 39 0.9× 12 371

Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Mooij

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Mooij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Mooij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Mooij more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Mooij

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Mooij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Mooij. The network helps show where Michael C. Mooij may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael C. Mooij

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael C. Mooij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael C. Mooij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael C. Mooij. Michael C. Mooij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Eggen, C.A.M., et al.. (2025). Editor's Choice – A Randomised, Single Blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Flush Endovenous Laser Ablation with Standard Endovenous Laser Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 69(5). 768–774. 2 indexed citations
2.
Etten‐Jamaludin, Faridi S. van, Susan van Dieren, Michiel A. Schreve, et al.. (2025). Anatomic Success of Treatment Modalities for Small Saphenous Vein Incompetence: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 71(1). 135–145.
3.
Ünlü, Çağdaş, et al.. (2024). Long-term outcomes of mechanochemical ablation using the Clarivein device for the treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence. Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 13(1). 101967–101967. 2 indexed citations
5.
Eggen, C.A.M., Pascal Pronk, Michael C. Mooij, et al.. (2021). Ten-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anesthesia. Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 10(3). 646–653.e1. 17 indexed citations
6.
Huizing, Eline, et al.. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of mechanochemical endovenous ablation using Flebogrif for varicose veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 10(1). 248–257.e2. 19 indexed citations
7.
Huizing, Eline, et al.. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment modalities for anterior accessory saphenous vein insufficiency. Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease. 37(3). 165–179. 5 indexed citations
8.
Lawson, James A., Stefanie A. Gauw, Pascal Pronk, et al.. (2017). Prospective comparative cohort study evaluating incompetent great saphenous vein closure using radiofrequency-powered segmental ablation or 1470-nm endovenous laser ablation with radial-tip fibers (Varico 2 study). Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 6(1). 31–40. 55 indexed citations
9.
Mooij, Michael C., et al.. (2016). Chronic leg ulcer: does a patient always get a correct diagnosis and adequate treatment?. Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease. 31(1_suppl). 68–73. 24 indexed citations
10.
Gauw, Stefanie A., James A. Lawson, C.J. van Vlijmen-van Keulen, et al.. (2015). Five-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anesthesia. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 63(2). 420–428. 77 indexed citations
11.
Lawson, James, Stefanie A. Gauw, Pascal Pronk, et al.. (2013). Sapheon: the solution?. Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease. 28(1_suppl). 2–9. 22 indexed citations
12.
Boer, E. M. de, Catherine van Montfrans, Michael C. Mooij, et al.. (2013). Autologous skin substitute for hard‐to‐heal ulcers: Retrospective analysis on safety, applicability, and efficacy in an outpatient and hospitalized setting. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 21(5). 667–676. 15 indexed citations
13.
Gauw, Stefanie A., Pascal Pronk, Michael C. Mooij, et al.. (2012). Detection of varicose vein recurrence by duplex ultrasound: intra- and interobserver reproducibility. Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease. 28(2). 109–111. 1 indexed citations
14.
Pronk, Pascal, Stefanie A. Gauw, Michael C. Mooij, et al.. (2010). Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Sapheno-Femoral Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein with Endovenous Laser Ablation (980 nm) Using Local Tumescent Anaesthesia: One Year Results. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 40(5). 649–656. 102 indexed citations
15.
Pronk, Pascal, Stefanie A. Gauw, Michael C. Mooij, et al.. (2010). Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Sapheno-Femoral Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein with Endovenous Laser Ablation (980 nm) Using Local Tumescent Anaesthesia: One Year Results. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 52(5). 1423–1424. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026