Michael Bührer

879 citations
24 papers · 651 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Bührer

24 papers receiving 620 citations

Peers

Michael Bührer
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 279
  • Developmental Neuroscience 61
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 63
  • Toxicology 26
  • Small Animals 48
Replace R. Calvo with:
R. Calvo Spain
William F. Ebling United States
Virginia D. Schmith United States
M Eckert Switzerland
Jay Ham United States
Achiel Van Peer Belgium
France Varin Canada
W H Ziegler Switzerland
D. R. Stanski United States
G. Ziegler Germany
Michael Bührer relative to R. Calvo Spain R. Calvo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
R. Calvo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bührer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bührer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bührer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bührer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bührer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bührer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bührer. The network helps show where Michael Bührer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Bührer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Bührer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Bührer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20123
2 20035
3 199724
4 19961
5 199471
6 199432
7 19923
8 199272
9 1991141
10 19914
11 199034
12 199093
13 19908
14 199011
15 198710
16 198722
17 198612
18
Absolute bioavailability of glyceryl trinitrate from a transdermal system, assessed by digital plethysmography.
19854
19 19844
20
[1st use of lactitol in the treatment of porto-systemic encephalopathy].
198212

About Michael Bührer

Michael Bührer is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Toxicology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (7 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (279 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (61 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (63 citations), Toxicology (26 citations) and Small Animals (48 citations). Michael Bührer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include P. Maitre, Donald R. Stanski, D. R. Stanski, D. Thomson, Martin S. Angst, Jörn Lötsch, Rolf Lauber, Orlando Hung, William F. Ebling and Steven L. Shafer. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, International Journal of Psychophysiology, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026