Michael Booth

548 total citations
11 papers, 394 citations indexed

About

Michael Booth is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Booth has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 394 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 4 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Michael Booth's work include Dysphagia Assessment and Management (4 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). Michael Booth is often cited by papers focused on Dysphagia Assessment and Management (4 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). Michael Booth collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Michael Booth's co-authors include Eric D. Peterson, Pamela S. Douglas, Rachel S. Dokholyan, Sean M. O’Brien, Fred H. Edwards, J. Matthew Brennan, Yue Zhao, James M. Brennan, Kevin J. Anstrom and Yue Zhao and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Gastroenterology and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

Michael Booth

10 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Michael Booth
Morgan Harloff United States
Adham Elmously United States
Farhang Yazdchi United States
Salem Badr United States
Hans A. Verheul Netherlands
Morgan Harloff United States
Michael Booth
Citations per year, relative to Michael Booth Michael Booth (= 1×) peers Morgan Harloff

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Booth. The network helps show where Michael Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Booth. Michael Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Siersema, Peter D., Albert J. Bredenoord, José M. Conchillo, et al.. (2017). Electrical Stimulation Therapy (EST) of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) for Refractory Gerd and Two Year Results of an International Multicenter Trial. Gastroenterology. 152(5). S470–S470. 1 indexed citations
2.
Siersema, Peter D., Albert J. Bredenoord, José M. Conchillo, et al.. (2014). 953 Electrical Stimulation Therapy (EST) of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) -an Effective Therapy for Refractory GERD -Interim Results of an International Multicenter Trial. Gastroenterology. 146(5). S–167. 7 indexed citations
3.
Conchillo, José M., Albert J. Bredenoord, Jelle P. Ruurda, et al.. (2014). Tu1110 Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Electrical Stimulation Improves Sleep Quality and Work Productivity in Patients With Refractory GERD. Gastroenterology. 146(5). S–755. 1 indexed citations
4.
Brennan, J. Matthew, Fred H. Edwards, Yue Zhao, et al.. (2013). Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Mechanical Versus Biologic Aortic Valve Prostheses in Older Patients. Circulation. 127(16). 1647–1655. 165 indexed citations
5.
Douglas, Pamela S., Eric D. Peterson, Kevin J. Anstrom, et al.. (2013). Effect of Race and Ethnicity on Outcomes With Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal Stents. Circulation. 127(13). 1395–1403. 53 indexed citations
6.
Kutcher, Michael A., J. Matthew Brennan, Sunil V. Rao, et al.. (2013). Comparative effectiveness of drug‐eluting stents on long‐term outcomes in elderly patients treated for in‐stent restenosis: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 83(2). 171–181. 7 indexed citations
7.
Siersema, Peter, Arjan Bredenoord, Alex Escalona, et al.. (2013). Electrical Stimulation Therapy (EST) of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES): An Effective Therapy for Refractory GERD - Interim Results of an International Multicenter Trial. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 108. S82–S82. 4 indexed citations
9.
Brennan, James M., Fred H. Edwards, Yue Zhao, et al.. (2012). Early Anticoagulation of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Older Patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 60(11). 971–977. 84 indexed citations
10.
Brennan, James M., Eric D. Peterson, John C. Messenger, et al.. (2012). Linking the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry With Medicare Claims Data. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 5(1). 134–140. 61 indexed citations
11.
Booth, Michael, et al.. (1993). Audit reduces the reluctance to use single fractions for painful bone metastases. Clinical Oncology. 5(1). 15–18. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026